The joys of mid-fi


What I’m writing about here applies to classical music but might have parallels in other music too. I’ve brought this topiic up in different ways before.

Years ago when I was blissfully ensconced in mif-fi, I could easily compare different performances of the same classical work with the confidence that the sound quality would be essentially the same. There would be no issues of soundstaging, detail, et al that would make it hard for me to compare. It was easy to judge a performance on its own merits without complicating factors. Now, it’s almost impossible to assess a performance without placing SQ into the mix. A mediocre recording might be extremely attractive due the sound alone, Conversely, a very good performance might be shunted aside as “unlistenable.”

Oh, for the good old days of mid-fi! 😁

128x128rvpiano

@immatthewj

You are correct, my systems do produce great detail, however they do so proportionally. By that, I mean if you listen for them the details are there, just not in your face. In the same way that if you listen in a quiet symphony hall you can hear the echo all around from venue, but you must direct your attention to it in order to hear it. Btw, my systems are shown under my UserID in virtual systems.

So, unless a CD or LP is actively bad, my system does not draw attention to it and it sounds pretty good. Very few albums sound really bad… having said that, there are some real stinkers out there… early Yardbirds (I think) and some Russian symphony orchestra recording. I have more than once bought a great Shostakovich by the USSR Symphony Orchestra and choir with great anticipation, only to hear the most horrible tinny recording. oh well.

Post removed 

Very good point (no pun intended.)   
No, you don’t hear pinpoint sound staging at a real concert.

 

Post removed 

RV, FWIW, IME, I'd bet that when you were listening to music over a mid fi system you were not focused on its recorded sound so much as you were exploring new music or the alternative performances of music of which you were already aware. From that experience you developed preferences which you carried forward into your development of a high fi system. Music, or performances of such, dicated how you wanted to hear it over your hifi. By way of example I fell in love with Kleiber's version of Beethoven's 5th. Even now, I don't listen to other versions by conductors whose version doesn't draw me in regardless of the competence of the recording. 

Not so much with Richter's version of Mussorgsky's Pictures (1957 live at Sofia). To me there has never been a better performance more ineptly recorded as this. I do not take it off the shelf but I do find that I there are quite a few newer performances, better recorded, which I can easily enjoy. 

I guess the importance of the sound quality today is greatly influenced by  the importance of the music (to me).  Much of the music is well heard in my mind so what I hear is not so important over my hifi(?) system so long as the sound is not offense to my hifi ears. This morning I'm listening to RR's recording of Copland's Fanfare, Appalachian Spring, and 3rd Symphony. Hog heaven, even though I'm sure there are better (technically speaking) performance available. Over my system the sound is as good as it gets (or needs to be). Guilty pleasure.