I'd think the quality bump of the N200 would be worth running $200 of CAT6 cable a few feet. Just an idea.
@jazzman7, thanks for the correction regarding I2S being synchronous. All the more reason then to spend a bit more then on the streamer and maybe a bit less on a DAC if you aren't going to be using the DACs' femtoclock circuitry.
- ...
- 471 posts total
@lanx0003 You seem to be missing the point. The OP likes his Dac3, and I agree with him. His question is about a STREAMER. You seem to have cherry picked one negative review regarding the Benchmark, despite the many positive ones. You may not know it, but not everyone thinks that newer is better. Some are in love with the dac in their older cd players. Did you know that the OP is a classical music aficionado and believes that his dac renders the music correctly? Many agree with him. For example: "I concluded my May 2004 review of Benchmark's DAC1 by calling it an "audiophile bargain." The same applies to the DAC3 B. Highly recommended for Class A+ in Stereophile's Recommended Components, along with the DAC3 HGC, which Benchmark says sounds identical.—John Atkinson" FWI this is from March 2023 https://www.stereophile.com/content/benchmark-dac3-hgc-da-preamplifier-headphone-amplifier-benchmark-dac3-b |
As others have said, all is not lost! Get Mesh or a Wi-Fi extender and go hardwired from that to the Aurender. @ghdprentice uses a Wi-Fi extender with his uber-expensive Aurender with great results. Plus, you really don’t wanna use any streamer with pure Wi-Fi because the Wi-Fi receiver in the streamer can greatly compromise performance so you’ll be better off using a mesh/extender no matter what streamer you use. Stick with the N200! |
You’ll know when you hear it. Give the N200 at least 10 days to settle by running it 24/7 (just set the queue to repeat all tracks). Don’t jump to conclusions too early. |
- 471 posts total