DCS Sending Legal Notice To Reviewer (Golden Sound) Over an Old Review of Their Bartok DAC

@cleeds if you are referring to libel or slander then yes you have first amendment protections against private party suits assuming what you wrote or said is demonstrably true.  
I finally see the disconnect we were having, I was speaking within the context of, for example, a forum removing any content it wants.  Within the context of dcs and goldenear and claims of libel or slander, goldenear certainly has protections as long as what was posted/written is true (or at least not libel or slander, I don’t think it is)

And here is a response to the DCS response

https://forum.headphones.com/t/dcs-response-and-story/23779

Yeah

Watched the video. Not that I was ever going to buy Dcs gear anyway, but certainly would never consider it now. 
 

Reviews are opinion pieces. Unless, as Dcs claims, there were factual misrepresentations of the product, they did not disclose what those misrepresentations were. 
 

Looks to be some pretty petty actions by Dcs if this indeed is the case. 

As an attorney in practice for over 38 years, I offer the following:

1. The First Amendment applies only to government prohibition or regulation of speech. It is inapplicable to disputes between private parties.

2. Defamation claims typically have short statutes of limitation depending on the State (i.e., 1 to 2 years from the date of the defamation). So, depending on when the alleged defamatory statement was made, dCS might be time-barred from asserting such a claim.

3. If dCS is determined to be a corporate "public figure," then the alleged defamatory statement must have been made with "actual malice" for there to be a recovery (monetary or otherwise), which is a fairly high bar to overcome.

All of the guys who are discussing the First amendment need to know that neither dCS is an American company nor Golden Sound is an American Resident, so First Amendment is not applicable in the first place. Hence I was talking about a framework which would be laid down for manufacturers and reviewers. I tried to explain this to cleed by givig an example of Hong Kong but he is not able to understand that which is ok.

Regards,
Audio_phool