@mdalton having just read that review I’m not sure where that amp SNR is coming from. The MA9500 specs read as 114db for the amp SNR. What am I missing?
dCS Bartok Apex vs McIntosh DA2 - Trouble Hearing the Difference
I am currently playing a new set of Focal Scala Evos with a McIntosh MA9500, fed by a Wiim Pro playing Tidal Direct. This set up uses the McIntosh DA2, which sounds remarkable to my untrained ears.
I borrowed a dCS Bartok Apex from my local dealer. Given that I can run balanced out (using Transparent Reference Gen 6 cables) to the MA9500, I can switch inputs to compare the DA2 & Wiim vs the Bartok (DAC & Streaming) very quickly. I level matched the best I could.
What I am confused about, though, is just how close the DA2 sounds to the Bartok. The most noticeable difference is how forward and prevalent vocals are with the DA2. They seem anchored to the center image and several feet more forward into the room, whereas in the Bartok they are a bit more recessed, and integrated into the rest of the music. The Bartok soundstage is also wider, but not shockingly so. The sound is definitely smoother or "rounder" with the Bartok as compared to the DA2.
I admit I am relatively new to critical listening, but I think I expected the difference between the $20K Bartok and the built-in DA2 to be more profound. I'm not anxious to spend the money on the Bartok, but am willing to do if it is a significant step up, which I think it should be.
So what am I missing? Am I perhaps limited by the MA9500? My dealer doesn't love autoformer-based Mc products, but many do, so I would have thought the MA9500 is sufficiently resolving. Room acoustics are not the best, but certainly not terrible.
Interested in any thoughts or feedback.
- ...
- 49 posts total
@mdalton I saw that in the review but I don’t see those numbers reflected in McIntosh’s specs, I see 114db for the amp. Just not sure where the reviewers are getting their numbers. |
Paul Miller of HiFi News is one of the most respected people in the industry. Has been doing measurements on gear on his custom modified test equipment for years. His stuff is by far the most reliable and consistent in my experience. You should reach out to him if you want to understand better. I am not an expert, but I wonder if the manufacturer publishing the SNR “at input” isn’t actually giving you their estimate of the DAC SNR. Regardless, when comparing across different brands, always best to use reliable 3rd party estimates so you’re seeing apples to apples. |
I love your room. Do you allow people to bring red wine into this room? I like amplifiers from McIntosh but don’t like any of their processors. They don’t like selling tube line stages without phono stage for some reason. They cram so much stuff into these processors and integrated components. You don’t know what you’re getting.. If you’re playing around with an expensive Bartok component I would consider getting a nice line stage preamp to use within your system. And then you can do all kinds of component comparisons without worrying about contamination from some crazy integrated processor. I use an av processor from nad with a line stage added on top of it for 2 Channel listening. Also the streamer being used may not be the greatest in the scheme of things and I saw a comment up top it could be a serious bottleneck basically negating anything of quality that gets involved with it. Although streamer may be perfectly great I don’t know. I use a lumin X 1 streamer dac which I find ideal because I hate dealing with separate dacs all the connectivity issues that goes along with it. lumin does a great job incorporating these things together and it's got a separate power box which always is a turn on |
- 49 posts total