My Esoteric (X03SE) sounded horrible until I went to over 1,000 hours. It is also very dependent on good power cord and conditioner. Genkides-I wouldn't sent it back, yet. Also, balanced out is the way to go. You do need good IC's.
Esoteric SA-50 SACD player, Is it for me?
I am currently using a Mark Levinson 39, which I like.
But I am interested in trying High Resolution digital.
The SA-50 seems to offer may features that I am looking for, balanced variable output and digital inputs for PC audio and a SqueezeBox, USB , etc.
I listen to classical only, use ML331 amp direct ,no preamp.
Speakers, Ariel 10T.
Does anyone know how the variable output on the SA-10 is implemented? Analog like the ML or digitally?
Would this be a good choice? Are there other units I should consider?
Thanks for any input.
Ken
But I am interested in trying High Resolution digital.
The SA-50 seems to offer may features that I am looking for, balanced variable output and digital inputs for PC audio and a SqueezeBox, USB , etc.
I listen to classical only, use ML331 amp direct ,no preamp.
Speakers, Ariel 10T.
Does anyone know how the variable output on the SA-10 is implemented? Analog like the ML or digitally?
Would this be a good choice? Are there other units I should consider?
Thanks for any input.
Ken
- ...
- 15 posts total
- 15 posts total