Gsherwood53-could be system synergy. I run balanced throughout. I used Tara labs The One balanced & single ended and the sound was, to me, better with balannced. Background was dead black, highs more extended and deeper soundstage. The SE sounded very good but the balanced just sounded better, in my system. The placements of instruments was better and it was much easier to hear separate violins within a group of four with the balanced.
Esoteric SA-50 SACD player, Is it for me?
I am currently using a Mark Levinson 39, which I like.
But I am interested in trying High Resolution digital.
The SA-50 seems to offer may features that I am looking for, balanced variable output and digital inputs for PC audio and a SqueezeBox, USB , etc.
I listen to classical only, use ML331 amp direct ,no preamp.
Speakers, Ariel 10T.
Does anyone know how the variable output on the SA-10 is implemented? Analog like the ML or digitally?
Would this be a good choice? Are there other units I should consider?
Thanks for any input.
Ken
But I am interested in trying High Resolution digital.
The SA-50 seems to offer may features that I am looking for, balanced variable output and digital inputs for PC audio and a SqueezeBox, USB , etc.
I listen to classical only, use ML331 amp direct ,no preamp.
Speakers, Ariel 10T.
Does anyone know how the variable output on the SA-10 is implemented? Analog like the ML or digitally?
Would this be a good choice? Are there other units I should consider?
Thanks for any input.
Ken
- ...
- 15 posts total
- 15 posts total