Who Gets Left Out?


Purchased a Puritan Audio PSM 156 power conditioner that will have burn in completed tomorrow.  The PSM 156 has six outlets but I have seven components to power.  Which one doesn’t get invited to the party?  I’m running the following:

-LTA MicroZOTL pre

- 2 LTA ZOTL40 amps

-Rotel CD player

-KEF KF92 sub

-LTA Aero DAC (arrives in two weeks)

-Bluesound Node (soon to be replaced)

Suggestions?

troutstreamnm

I agree with the sub consensus, thanks everyone.  Plugging into the power conditioner does have another advantage associated with the surge protection, but can someone explain to me why plugging the amps directly into the wall is better than getting clean power from the conditioner.  I would think amps with transformers would benefit from conditioned power.  My LTA amps don't have transformers and may not benefit as much, but the surge protections is important.  Thanks

Just get a simple outlet extender a passive one and plug i. Throwing quality devices into it node and sub

 

Dave  and Troy

Audio intellect  nj

but can someone explain to me why plugging the amps directly into the wall is better than getting clean power from the conditioner.

I’ve read both sides of the argument. The argument against plugging amps into a power conditioner seems to be that the amplifiers are pulling a lot of current and the power conditioner is a choke point.

Back in the ’90s I talked to the tech guy at Cary Audio Design about plugging the Cary amp I had at the time into a power conditioner and he didn’t tell me not to do it, but he didn’t sound like he was crazy about the idea. I have tried it both ways and I, personally, don’t remember ever hearing a significant (if any) difference. As it is, I have my present amp plugged into the wall, my sub plugged into the wall of another circuit, and my pre and my SACDp plugged into a power conditioner that is plugged into the wall of the same circuit the amps are plugged into. And I really only have the pre and the CDP plugged into the power conditioner because I have decided I only want to use one dedicated circuit, instead of 2 or 3 dedicated circuits, for my audio equipment, and the power conditioner gives me more outlets. (Except for my sub which is on an altogether different circuit.)

What I am not sure I understand is: with the priority subs seem to play in everyone’s systems these days (good clean bass and all) why everyone relegates them to unconditioned power.

Also, will your power conditioner be plugged into a dedicated circuit? From what I have read on this site, a dedicated circuit might be more important than a power conditioner.

If you have another outlet on the line pick up a Furman PST-8 for the sub, and you can always experiment by trying other components with the Furman (for kicks).

I have 2 of the PST-8’s and they seem to be sonically OK as far as I can tell plus the surge protection WORKS (I live in LA/West Hollywood) and we experience gobs of electrical events here.

Per "Erick" (sp?) the expert who’s currently taking a vacation from A’Gon the Furman PST-8 is the lowest you want to go in their line for competent surge protection along with what I feel is good conditioning/SQ.

For a sub it’s a no-brainer, IMO, as it will do the job for around $200.

My big APC for the computer conked out a while back and I’ve got the computer plugged into the PST-8 now along with the mini system we use @ the computer (no noticeable drop in SQ).

I have 2 separate conditioners in the living room system (one for digital and one for analog), but this was done years ago prior to the power transformer feeding our building being replaced/updated, so perhaps doing so is not a big deal now (too lazy to check/experiment).

It’s not clear (to me) what Audiotroy is suggesting, but if it’s just a dual/splitter outlet then that could be done for a few bucks.

 

DeKay