The sonic presentation of systems are vastly different given the same source material. If the system is tuned to maximize detail, with a lean midrange to become a microscope on details, then the resolution of the source material becomes really critical, and unless perfect can sound bad. Systems like this tend to lose the music… the gestalt because of the missing dominance of the midrange and as a consequence the rhythm and pace.
A system that appropriately reproduces the audio spectrum and gets the gestalt of the music will not be very sensitive to the recording… the focus on the music not on details and micro imaging. Also, importantly, there are systems at most levels of in investment the can achieve this gestalt (generally tubed) and greater levels of investment do lead to greater detail and imaging… etc, but they are carefully crafted to keep the overall balance so not to lose the music.
This makes me think of using sharpening in digital imaging. Beautiful and emotional images are created using a small amount of sharpening, but more and the image get sharper but attenuates the emotional connection, more and it creates fatigue just looking at it. More and it looks terrible.
I’ve owned systems with spectacular detail, transparency, and speed. Great scientific instruments that completely missed the point of musical reproduction. I would listen to the system and recording instead of being drawn into the music. My systems are now musical first and typically I don’t notice the recording quality unless really bad.