All I would add, in my humble opinion, is that it has nothing to do with which technology they use, but it’s implementation. In this case, the implementation seems to be fantastic, though I do agree it’s not technically a close box
New Radiant Acoustics Clarity 6.2’s
So I took a leap and bought the Clarity 6.2’s to replace my Canton 9.2 DC and also my Thiel CS2.4’s. And no, I didn’t hear them first, but they have a 30’day return policy (which I will not be using).
I’ve been following a lot of the designs by Lyngdorf, this being one of them - this being a collaboration, and also at a much cheaper price than his bigger speaker brands
i’m happy to report the hype seems real. They are very clean and super three-dimensional. They’re natural sounding and the bass goes deep enough in my small 15 x 15 room that I didn’t need the subwoofer anymore. You still need one if you wanna get to the down low to 20-30 Hz or so but if you don’t listen to that kind of music it’s unneeded IMO
I run them on a Luxman 507Z using a Wiim ultra going to my NAD M51 DAC.
The first thing that strikes you is the huge sound stage, and the feeling that these speakers are more like floor standards than small bookshelf like speakers. Well, they may be the size of bookshelf but they require a stand, and most importantly the tweeters must be at ear level. They don’t have great vertical dispersion, but do have great horizontal dispersion.
anyway, I haven’t seen any real reviews other than Erin and Stjerholm on YouTube, but really nobody else so I thought I’d throw this in as a starter
- ...
- 13 posts total
- 13 posts total