What exactly is PRaT???


Ok, it’s like this thing and is associated with “toe tapping” and such.  I confess, I don’t get it.  Apparently companies like Linn and Naim get it, and I don’t and find it a bit frustrating.  What am I missing?  I’m a drummer and am as sensitive as anyone to timing and beats, so why don’t I perceive this PRaT thing that many of you obviously do and prize as it occurs in stereo systems?  When I read many Brit reviews a lot of attention goes to “rhythm” and “timing” and it’s useless to me and I just don’t get it.  If someone can give me a concrete example of what the hell I’m not getting I’d sincerely be most appreciative.  To be clear, enough people I greatly respect consider it a thing so objectively speaking it’s either something I can’t hear or maybe just don’t care about — or both.  Can someone finally define this “thing” for me cause I seriously wanna learn something I clearly don’t know or understand.  

soix

@soix 

I thought I understood the concept to mean musical pace, rhythm and timing.  However I have come to think of it as more than that- explanation in a minute. 

A system with a lack of PRAT sounds mono level- at a micro dynamic level, minor swings in volume, not opposed to big swings in level which is different- meaning all sounds tend to be banded together in a limited micro bandwidth and when listening tends to sound flat and unexciting, like the music just sits there by comparison.  

However once I acquired fast speakers and a fast class A amplifier PRAT took on a whole new meaning for me.  It was no longer just about rapid transitions in micro dynamics, it also became about musical element separation and audible distinction.  Musical elements became much more on their own in space, relative volume level and distinction / clarity.  It was as if each voice or instrument had its own physical channel and speaker.  Everything stood out more on its own and quite amazing.  The music and sound had much more contrast which let the pace and rhythm of each instrument become clearly audible.  A drum track in the background was much easier to follow and focus on because it was much more delineated than with a less dynamically capable system which seemed to blend everything together.  

@bryhifi 

 

Great comments. I never thought of it that way. Good analogy. 
 

I just want to point out again that PRaT is probably the most difficult parameter to sense. I know many folks that do not know how to detect it yet. But with thought and careful listening you probably will eventually. And that is likely to be a real epiphany.

False orthodoxy is prone to pop up in high end audio, and PRaT is one such. I know what it is--and have successfully ignored it for decades.

Nevertheless, this is an amusing thread. I like that it brought out a couple drummers. My favorite comment:

"...it was hard to hum and toe tap to Schoenberg"

Mrs. Schoenberg would beg to differ....

I don't own Linn or Naim equipment so  I guess I'm not aloud to talk on the subject.But the feeling of the music and vibration, from the open track seem to tell the story. I GUESS....