Schiit Yggdrasil DAC, why did they change it ?

I sold the Yggdrasil twice hoping for something better before i bought it again for the 3rd time. I have the OG and it is end game for my specific tastes, especially when i run DHertz MasterClass files through it.

I have audited everything from Berkeley, Holo, Nagra, Aavik, Vermeer, MSB, Mola Mola, etc on one of my rigs....not interested, but, doesn't mean you won't be.

I thought the More is Whatever version and the full AP reports were just a JStoddard/MMoffat answer to some 0.0000001 THD chasing scientists who are forged in the flames of another forum.

@decooney thanks for that input. Nice to know it (the Bifrost 2/64) isn't a "rolled off" dark sounding DAC. I'll take all that under consideration for its price point of under $1K. Other reviewers have mentioned that to "best" it, you do indeed have to go up the food chain to something like a Yggy, Holo, Denafrips, or LAIV, but those are $$$ more, and I'm not sure my system (or my old ears) could hear a demonstrable difference.  I find it appropriate then that Schiit offers the 2/64, and the next step up is all the way to the Yggy (in its various incarnations) to get a solid difference in audio quality. 

@moonwatcher not dark, that's for sure. I had come from some warmer dacs prior, and including an upgraded tube dac [different cap and tube options] too which was open but warmer too if that makes any sense. I needed a fill-in dac to use while I was deciding and eventually having another dac built a certain way (in the meantime) is how I ended up with the Schiit Bifront 2/64 multi-bit dac for a year or so. Also, I just wanted to try it for the entry price, and used it as a backup reference dac to other dacs. I found it to be quite neutral, open, with added nuance to the depth of detail in fact. Was not lush though.  Just plain neutral maybe. I'd rotate it in/out, and would say it's a bit more detailed than some dacs, coming with that newer TI multi-bit chip set in it, even with the filter switch.  Agree, if you want that extra finesse to the sound, I could see where many step to the Yggy. For me, I did want a little more warmth with a bit more lushness to the sound, and moved on. 

For Moonwatcher,  I have the Bifrost 2/64, and my hearing also rolls off at about 12.5 to 13 kHz.  I love the Bifrost, although the only other DAC I have experience with are those in my iPad Pro, the AQ Cobalt Dragonfly, and the ESS DAC in my Schiit Jotunheim.  Perhaps due to my hearing loss, I don’t notice a roll-off.  My  LPs—such as Sheffield LPs of the 1980s do sound more “brilliant” when the appropriate content is there, but the Bifrost, IMO, does a very good job.  I am particularly pleased with the imaging/soundstage (both lateral and depth) and tonal qualities of the instruments.as reproduced by my Rogue RP-7 tube preamp, Odyssey Kismet (upgraded almost to Kismet) SS monobloc amps, and Fyne F-702 speakers, augmented by a pair of Rythmik F12 subwoofers.  I’ve considered stepping up to the Yggdrasil MIB, but I wonder how much improvement I would get for three times the price.

heading to Capital Audiofest this weekend and plan on auditioning several DACs. Not sure the Yggy will be there, but do know Geshelli Labs will be there, very interested in hearing the different versions of their Dayzee. I've been researching the Yggy, Dayzee and the LTA Aero. I'll listen to a bunch of others, will be hard to really tell due to all of these will be running different systems in different rooms, but I hope to determine their nature and help me decide which one I will order for home trials. Should be a fun weekend.