My Comments on the Infigo Audio IS-1 Signature Streamer


A $5,000 SRP Infigo Audio IS-1 Signature streamer replaced my MAC Book Pro dedicated for music streaming only.   Both streamers have Audirvana Studio music player installed.  Audirvana Remote is installed on my Apple iPad.  

Audirvana Studio enhances audio quality on computers by optimizing the operating system for audio playback and disabling non-essential services. It functions as a third-party player, scanning local music libraries and integrating streaming services like Tidal and Qobuz, but not Spotify or Apple Music.  Audirvana offers both subscription and lifetime license models. 

My Ethernet source drives a netLINK Ethernet Media Converter model HTB-GS-03 with a fiber optic output driving a fiber optic cable to the streamer.  A 5V wall adapter powers the netLINK.  The streamer’s only digital output is USB to the DAC.  Infigo chose USB as the sole output format because done right it provides ultimate performance.  Any other format would increase cost while limiting bit rate, sample rate and ultimate performance.    

Fiber optic isolation in this case improves audio quality by eliminating network noise and jitter. This separation between the ‘dirty’ network and the clean audio chain ensures that RF and EMI interference, as well as high-impedance leakage currents from network devices, do not degrade the audio signal. As a result, digital music reproduction is cleaner, quieter, and more transparent, providing a more natural and lifelike sound experience. 

It also incorporates ultra-low jitter re-clocking of network audio packets, reducing the need for specialized network equipment. The device supports multiple modes of operation, including Audirvana, uPnP, Roon, and HQPlayer, making it compatible with most music players.  

IS-1 employs Intel’s best Quad Core CPU with one core fully dedicated to music processing. This music core runs at a moderately high fixed rate while the other 3 cores vary in speed depending on needs.  Intel primarily designed this as a state-of-the-art CPU with maximum speed and power for mobile devices. Infigo chose this CPU for its speed, power and low-current draw, allowing the use of a mandatory linear power supply to meet performance goals.

Onboard IS-1 is a toroidal transformer and 100W linear power supply, about 5x the maximum required for immense power supply headroom.  Infigo includes a built-in local webpage (http://infigostreamer.local) for easy control and customization, with dimmable front-panel LED with full-off option.

Each of 4 included footers employs 3 black “star” (synthetic) sapphire bearings.  Each footer has a lower half with plain stud and upper half with threaded stud.  To minimize cross-threading, and to make it easy, I placed my IS-1 on a small box to raise it.  Screw the 4 upper footer halves into the outrigger’s 4 threaded holes.  I then placed my IS-1 on its shelf.

Insert 3 sapphire bearings into 3 hemispherical cutouts in one lower footer half and slowly slide them (one at a time) under the footer half with rubber O-ring.  Rotate the lower footer half and sapphires till the latter fit fully into the upper footer’s hemispherical cutouts.  Now the 2 halves are properly “sandwiched,” the O-ring providing a friction press fit. Repeat for the remaining 3 lower footer halves and 9 sapphire bearings.

In the future, before picking up IS-1, remove all 4 lower footer halves and secure the 12 sapphires in a jar or elsewhere.  If not, the lower footer half can unexpectedly detach with risk of lost sapphires. 

The sapphire bearings act like a diode, channeling vibration from the streamer into the supporting panel.   

see link for more info on the INFIGO IS-1Streamer

FYI: Other operation modes are ‘uPnP’ endpoint, which will present the streamer as an endpoint in the network that can be reached via all music software that can play to a uPnP endpoint.  The streamer can also operate as a Roon endpoint; you will need another computer in the network to run the Roon core software, which can then play to the streamer as endpoint.  For those that use Roon with HQPlayer for better sound quality, the streamer can operate as an HQPlayer Network Audio Adapter.

This “Signature” version is the base model $5,000; the “Cryogen” version is $7,000.  Both versions offer the same audio and musical performance with extra features on the Cryogen version.

The Infigo Audio IS-1 streamer has substantially improved my sound quality.   I immediately noticed my system sounds much better.   The music is clearer, bass is more powerful, and imaging has improved.  My Signature model lists for $5,000 and the Cryogen model $7,000.  

The INFIGO IS-1 Streamer is highly recommended.

 

 

 

 

hgeifman

Let me add this info. Quite a few high end companies have created their own proprietary links between components to get the best possible sound. What did a lot of these companies use as this interface? I2s. Here is a description from Esoteric on their es-link:

ES-Link
ES-Link is an ultra-wideband digital interface developed exclusively by Esoteric. The ES-Link 5 supports up to 22.5MHz DSD or 768kHz/48-bit PCM using two HDMI cables. The HDMI multi-cable configuration is used for the transmission of fully balanced audio data, LR clock and bit clock signals. Unlike conventional digital transmission, no processing is required for signal modulation at the sending end or for demodulation at the receiving end, thus significantly reducing the digital processing load on the DAC to achieve pure digital transmission.

@spkrplus i try to be careful in saying what I say. I’m glad you said what you said. I can buy anything I want. I choose the Method 4 Dac and Ls1 streaming combination because I get all the detail, soundstage and musicality without degrading sound quality. Most that I know that use roon say it’s a slight even though small loss in sound quality to gain functionality. So for me it is a non starter. I have had people and clients get rid of bigger name equipment and cables to purchase the Infigo stuff. I’m glad you are sharing your observations with us. Hans knows how the use the ess Sabre 9038 dac chip like no other because he used to work with the guy who invented the chipset . He believes that any loss of sound quality while building equipment is a non starter. So if it degrades sound quality it’s a no! He built this dac and streamer with that in mind. I been in this hobby 20 years and have never been happier. Anyone who tells you that they don’t need to hear something before they have an opinion on it is someone I wouldn’t listen to. There are some amazing guys in high end audio. Technology is being pushed to the limit in our hobby. There are guys that figure out how to get the best out of already existing platforms and methods. I think Hans has just pushed us to a new limit. I’m proud of the Method 4 and Ls1 and would put it up against anything. The method 4 dac faired well against all of the super dacs in a shootout on the Whatsbestforum Dac shootout last year. I offered to loan my streamer out simply because I’m that confident in its performance. But there are some guys that will shoot it down without hearing it. I don’t worry about that crowd because in this hobby there will be those but most audiophiles enjoy hearing something new. They understand that in each technology method new highs will be reached and there is a sense of curiosity and possible wow factor in each thing you put your ear on. If you already have you mind made up you have a right to. But some are more interested in showing us that they are right and how smart they are over actually listening and trying equipment with an open mind. Whatever you do try as much as you can. Audio is a journey. It’s YOUR OWN JOURNEY NOT THEIRS! @rbstehno i just had the 20k esoteric No1xd in my system 2 months ago while I loaned my dac out and I preferred the sound of the Infigo method 4 with the ls1. I was actually one of the first to get the ls1. Just my opinion. 

One of my last streamers was created by the digital genius behind Playback Designs, Andreas Koch. It used a Plink interface for the best performance. It also had SPDIF which sounded great on that unit. The Plink was implemented using a fibre optic cable something more and more designers are realizing is a magic bullet to kill noise. I also think the SPDIF was also connected to the fibre on the inside of the unit since it sounded so good. I had 2 other fibre streamers to compare side-by-side, Lumin X1 and a Sonore OpticalRendu. They all sounded different.

I sold this streamer since I found a much cheaper DAC that I was happy with for the long term and no longer was planning on spending a lot of money on the PBD Dream DAC. I only use fibre based streamers. The DAC connection is no longer the primary factor when I look for a streamer (USB, I2S, SPDIF, etc.).

I am very confused. The claim that every review prefers I2S or Ethernet over USB for sound quality may not be universally true BECAUSE of the many variables involved.

It seems that some reviews highlight advantages of I2S, such as lower latency and less noise due to better shielding, others argue that USB can perform equally well or better depending on the specific DAC and system setup. Additionally, practical implementations vary widely, and many users report different experiences based on THEIR equipment AND environment.

Based on my experience, Ultimately, the preference for I2S or Ethernet over USB depends on individual setups and subjective listening tests.

There are instances where USB can outperform I2S or Ethernet, particularly in well-designed systems. For example, high-quality DACs that implement asynchronous USB can achieve superior noise isolation and lower jitter compared to I2S, especially when the USB implementation is optimized for low interference. Additionally, some DAC manufacturers argue that USB provides better performance in specific setups, particularly when the source device is low-noise and properly isolates the USB signal from power supplies. Thus, while I2S and Ethernet have their advantages, USB can be the best choice depending on the specific components and configurations used.

The bottom line is that there are many options including IS2, USB, Ethernet, ES-Link and others. Everyone has to decide for themselves what implementation sounds best in their environment. There is no right solution for everyone because of the many variables.

AND, of course, get ready for the next cable design. Yikes!

 

“But there are some guys that will shoot it down without hearing it.”

There is a valid reason to do so, IS-1 is a half-baked product for ROON users. It appears to be designed targeted for audiences who prefers Audirvana. And that’s ok! Like most things in life, our audio choices are often driven by our preferences and price of admission.