A Review of the Denafrips Pontus Gen 15 DAC


(Disclaimer: I have no commercial or financial affiliation with Denafrips or any of its associated enterprises except as a customer. I'm not in any way an electronics expert, so my technical knowledge is pretty basic, probably just enough to be dangerous. My approach to audio is musical rather than technical.)

My journey with standalone DACs began a bit over 10 years ago when I was curious to see if one would improve the audio performance of my Cambridge Audio universal disc player. There were a number of steps (and missteps, for that matter) along the way, but I eventually wound up with an AMR DP-777 which was my introduction to R2R ladder DACs, though, to be honest, at first I was unaware that this DAC actually fell into this category. To me, it sounded particularly nice. Since I liked that one so much, I imagined that upgrading to a more modern ladder DAC would give me even more, so the next step, based on its glowing reviews, was a Sonnet Morpheus, which I lived with for about two and a half years. Don't get me wrong, this is an excellent DAC, but in my system, there still seemed to be room for improvement. That's when I got curious about Denafrips DACS, having read and watched so many very complimentary reviews. I figured that the Venus II-12th would be a logical next step considering my price range, and one was offered for sale by the good folks at TMR Audio. I wasn't able to jump quite quickly enough though, and it sold before I made up my mind act. In the end, that turned out to be my good fortune, because the Denafrips Pontus Gen 15 became available, and I was able to buy a brand new one for significantly less than the used Venus would have cost.

According to the vendor, this latest version of the Pontus, the Gen 15, has been upgraded to Venus II-12th level but at a lower price point. (As I understand it, the Venus II-12th has been discontinued now, pending the release of a newer version, the Venus Gen-15, slated to hit the market soon). Because I was offered the Pontus at an irresistible price, I threw caution to the wind and jumped at it. And am I ever glad I did!

To be fair, I've never heard what a really high-end DAC sounds like--I'm talking the ones with the 5-figure price tags like a DCS Rossini or Chord Dave--and I imagine those would require accompanying components of similar quality to tell their tale. My system is modest by those standards, but I've spent a number of years evolving it, and I'm happy with what I've achieved so far. (I'll list the components at the end of this review).

The recent addition of a streamer, and a CD transport really put my system to the test, revealing some shortcomings with the Sonnet DAC. It just couldn't seem to exert enough authority over the music: vocals sometimes exhibited glare, high frequencies could get shrill, and when the music got dense, the sound became grainy and harsh. I tried a number of remedies for this, including experimenting with different connections, adding filters to the ethernet and USB cables, and adding a linear power supply to the streamer, but the results were still less than satisfying. There are a limited number of connections the Sonnet DAC offers--just 1 each RCA digital, optical, USB (or ethernet via a different module for I2s input, which is a very unusual way to make that connection), and AES/EBU. Also, the Sonnet cannot decipher DSD. My particular configuration dictated that the transport could only be connected via AES/EBU, all the other inputs being occupied, so I could not take advantage of the I2s protocol. That was one of the reasons the Pontus Gen-15 was such an appealing option: it can output I2s via HDMI, which has opened up a whole new world of possibilities for my CD transport.

Because, as I said in my disclaimer, I'm not an electronics expert, I can't offer much meaningful commentary about the Pontus Gen-15's design, except to note that it has 2 very substantial (and HEAVY) toroidal transformers, and an encapsulated linear power supply. The DAC itself weighs in at a hefty 13.3 Kg (a bit over 29 lbs), so it's clearly designed to an industrial standard. The full specs and photos of the DAC's insides are available on the Denafrips website if you want further details.

What I want to focus on here is how this DAC actually sounds, and to get right to the point, it's absolutely amazing. Of course any brand new component will take some time to find its true voice, and Denafrips advises about 2 weeks of continuous use to accomplish this. However, right out of the box I could tell that I was going to experience something special even though there was some initial glassiness and thinness about the sound that needed time to even out. Now that's been accomplished, and I'm very impressed with what this DAC offers. Its signature sonic characteristic is clarity, which, according to what I had heard and read, was what the Venus DACs were noted for. To some that term might imply a thinness or brightness or hardness of tone, sacrificing musical appeal in favor of detail. This is absolutely not the case here, because along with its extraordinary precision, the new Pontus renders music with balance, weight, presence, and composure. Along with these qualities, I'm also hearing an appealing richness, a quality best conveyed by the word “musical.”

When I say “balanced,” I mean that there is an evenness of presentation across the whole frequency spectrum, not emphasizing or suppressing any specific range. “Weight” refers partly to bass response, but also to the overall fullness of the sound even into the upper mids. “Presence” is my way of describing how natural and in-the-room the music can sound when it's recorded that way, though for more expansive recordings--symphonies, say--the sense of space is unmistakable. Finally, “composure” is the term I use to define how well the Pontus Gen 15 controls the signal without becoming muddled or harsh when things get loud or dense. As noted above, this all adds up to exemplary clarity and abundant detail, but in no way fatiguing.

The Pontus Gen 15 has also endowed my system with significantly more precise stereo imaging. I have to be a little equivocal here, though, because the room where my system resides--the living room--doesn't offer much flexibility in how I can place the speakers and other components to maximize this characteristic. Specifically, I don't think I'll ever be able to get that room to impart much spatial depth to the music, and even the lateral (i.e. left/right) image could stand improvement, but within these restrictions, the improvements are noticeable. In a well-appointed, dedicated listening room, I feel quite sure this DAC could perform to a level that would satisfy a discerning audiophile.

With its array of inputs--HDMI for I2s, RCA and BNC digital, plus optical, AES/EBU and USB--the unit is capable of accommodating a pretty complicated system. It has XLR and RCA analog outputs, though Denafrips suggests you do not use these simultaneously, as it may affect the sound. There is a digital filter for fast or slow roll-off, accessed via the buttons on the front of the unit, and a choice of oversampling or non-oversampling processing, accomplished via a dedicated button. One odd little quirk is that the oversampling mode is the default--in this mode the LED indicator is OFF and in NOS mode, it's ON. To me that's kind of backwards, but these things are, I guess, subject to the whims of the designers. One other issue worth mentioning: while the DAC has a sensor for a remote control, a remote is not supplied, and Denafrips doesn't seem to have one available for this DAC, despite the fact that a whole page of the owner's manual is dedicated to it. Hopefully, one will be made available soon. We listeners can be pretty lazy about having to get up and physically push buttons to change inputs or turn the unit on and off. Also, as far as I can tell, apart from the OS and NOS modes, this DAC doesn't support upconverting files to higher densities (e.g. from 44.1 to 192 or 384), it only renders the signal it receives. It can, however, receive files formats from sources all the way up to DSD 1024.

Here's a description of how I'm using this DAC in my system: it's connected to my integrated amp via XLR. The CD transport is connected via HDMI (I2s), my streamer via the USB connection, my DVD/Blu-Ray player via optical, and the Roku box (yes, this also serves as the home theater system) via optical cable to a reclocker which then connects to the DAC via RCA digital cable. (I am particularly impressed by how good the TV sound is, both broadcast and streaming.)

There are a few classical CDs I like to use to test out my components. The first is a 1995 disc featuring a large suite of dances from Prokofiev's “Romeo and Juliet,” recorded live in Davies Symphony Hall by the San Francisco Symphony under Michael Tilson Thomas (RCA 68288). This recording contains just about every orchestral instrument and effect you could imagine, from soupy romantic strings to blaring brass to a hammered steel rail, and yes, even mandolins on one track. It's a sonic study in dynamic range, timbre, and ambiance. The next disc on the list is also the San Francisco Symphony, this time it's their Grammy-winning 1992 recording of Orff's “Carmina Burana” under Herbert Blomstedt (London 430-509). One track in particular, the baritone solo, “Estuans Interius” (track 11), is how I like to test stereo image. The voice should be precisely placed just a bit left of center and slightly recessed. The third CD on this list is the New York Philharmonic's remastered 1958 recording of Stravinsky's “Rite of Spring,” (Sony SMK 47629) conducted by Leonard Bernstein. Instead of looking for touchstone moments here, it's best to just let this performance wash over you. The sound quality is astounding, the performance thrilling.

With the Pontus Gen 15 DAC, these CDs all put their best foot (feet?) forward. The innate sweetness of the romantic passages of “Romeo and Juliet” really comes though, and the hammer-on-steel-rail (track 5) startles with its immediacy and realism. The scintillating dynamic climax that ends Act II (track 23) will give you chills. On the “Carmina Burana” recording, Kevin Macmillan's voice is placed exactly where I want to hear it, and the DAC's ability to render dynamics and detail makes “The Rite of Spring” truly exciting listen to.

You'll probably have to spend a lot more money to find a DAC that ups the Pontus Gen 15's game. What I can say about it from my own experience is that it easily bested my Sonnet DAC whose original price was about 50% higher. For my system, this has been a major step upwards, and I give this DAC a very high recommendation indeed, especially at its comparatively modest price point. It's available directly from Denafrips, or from one of their two American distributors, Audioman58 here on Audiogon (whom I recommend--very easy deal with very fast delivery), or Tek Audio Specialists in Texas.

(Please don't construe the following as a political statement--I don't intend it that way, it's just a footnote to my review in light of recent events: the future of Chinese electronics in the American market looks rather uncertain now because of the threat of punitive tariffs. This could add enormously to the price-tag of these components or even render them unavailable, though I'm sure we all hope this does not come to pass. It would be unfortunate to see these very fine electronics disappear from our markets.)

My system: Modwright KWI 200 integrated, Cambridge Audio CXU universal player, Shanling ET3 CD transport, Innuos Pulse Mini streamer with Small Green Computer LPS, Ryan R610 speakers, REL S-2 sub. The Roku box from a Samsung TV to the DAC through a Wyred4Sound remedy reclocker. Speaker and interconnect cables are Audience AU24 SE, and Morrow Audio MA4. Furman Elite-15 power conditioner with a Core Power Technologies Deep Core 1800 RFI and DC filter.

cooper52

I have a Pontus 15 arriving within a day or two. I was wondering, I may have missed it, but are most of you running the DAC in NOS mode? I'm coming from a Ares II using OS with Soft filter. I'm thinking with the Pontus 15, NOS might be the way to go?

I’ve had my Pontus 15th since June running in NOS, but just flipped to OS just last week to see which I liked best. I’m undecided which I like best to be honest. It’s not night and day different, but NOS mode is a little more organic sounding to my crappy ears

I would play around when you receive your unit, see which you like more. Maybe a case of NOS for some genres of music, OS for others

Denafrips Terminator 15th. Because folks on this thread asked me to comment on it. Acquired November 29, 2024. There is very little information about this DAC so i thought I would share what I can tell you about it since I just bought one.

Most of you probably have heard of the Denafrips Flagship DAC’s before, namely the Terminator + 12th-1. (They are big, heavy and solidly built-weighing in a 43 pounds, and the size of an SS amplifier.) The Plus has essentially been replaced by the Terminator 15th, they are the same except for the faceplate, but the good stuff inside is the same. (I suspect that there is also a new 15th firmware update in the FPGA but I cannot be sure) The new Design team at Denafrips has been kicking out new 15th DAC’s for a few months now, each is of the next level up from the predecessors, well except I don’t know about the Enyo 15th and Aris 15th. Not sure what the secret sauce is in them. But for example the Pontus 15th is the “old” Venus 12th-1. The Venus 15th is the “old” Terminator II 12th-1. OK so now that we have identified where the Terminator 15th is in the chain as the current top dog I can move on to what I think of it.

 

Preface, i can really only compare this DAC to my Venus II I had for 3 years, almost to this day in fact. I also have the internal DAC in my Legacy Wavelet II for comparison, but to my ears the Venus II was better, larger soundstage, better layered and maybe a bit more organic. The Venus II is a very good DAC, priced at $3000 for the past several years-no slouch. It has been very reliable and I trust the brand. FWIW I had very, very seriously considered the T+A DAC 200 for over a year. I was very close to making the buy but it would have cost me another $1000+ plus I don’t listen to DSD recordings or need the preamp feature to take full advantage of what it has to offer.

 

My Strategy for my system now being that I am retired, old and on a restrained disposable income. I have been adding to it with the end in mind. Final purchases for my long lasting enjoyment. New speakers, Amp, Streamer, interconnects, power cords etc. I recently placed a very expensive Audience frontRow Reserve USB between the Aurneder N200 and Denafrips Hermes DDC in place of the Audioquest Diamond. WOW. I also have added the clock sync feature between the DDC and the DAC as it’s an in Denafrips house enhancement I was looking forward to implementing. One of the reasons I chose the Terminator as well is I appreciate the R2R  “house sound” more than chip based DAC’s. I knew what I was getting into.I cannot audition stuff, I don’t live anywhere near a good audio store. Anyway, I wanted to build upfront with high resolution working toward the amp/speakers end of the line. I buy new because of warranty and longevity.

 

I can’t tell you if this DAC is equal to, better or worse that the T+A DAC 200 I almost bought, but I can say it is exactly what I was looking for, I love it. It’s got a ways to go to fully burn int, these R2R DACs are a painful process, I know based on how long the Venus II took. I got over 400 hours on it for now.

 

MY listening notes:

 

Realistic timbre to instruments and vocalists. More natural, small improvement but better. So real sounding.

Bass is deeper quick but more defined and textured. The bass is amazing, I love it!

More holographic soundstage and airy around instruments and vocalists-clearer separation of voices. I am able to hear farther into the recordings. Yes, hearing things I never heard before cliche’

Gets up and Boogies!

Realism, palpable presentation’I can and do listen for hours. 3-5 hours at  time.

Quiet, black background. 

soundstage bigger, hearing well outside the speakers now frequently.

piano is so realistic

delicate overtones, reverberations and decays

smoother presentation vs Venus -really like this just not digital sounding really.

 

Overall as the DAC progressed quite a bit from 100 hours to 400 hours. It takes about 700 hours to be it’s best. I am completely satisfied with this DAC, It is everything I was hoping to achieve from it.

You guys are certainly tempting me. If I read the tea leaves correctly, the Denafrips DACs have no analog electronics in them ... the resistor array is directly connected to the XLR output. If you use the RCA output, you are simply using half the resistors, not all of them.

More significantly, the interface between the following stage and the Denafrips resistor array will critically determine the sound, since there is no buffer stage to isolate them ... or add coloration, depending on how you look at it. Overall, this should be a good thing, because the best analog stage is no analog stage, but it does demand the following components are top quality, along with the interconnect (which should be short and low capacitance).

@lynn_olson If you can swing it i highly suggest you give the Terminator 15th a try. Also, if possible take advantage of the DDC pairing and clock sync feature. I bet you would be ecstatic paired with a Raven and set of blackbirds. XLR to the Raven. Pop the hood on it, you will be impressed.