Steve G has a point


I rarely watch Steve Gutenberg anymore, not that I don’t like him.  But I did watch an episode the other day and he raised an interesting point regarding subjective versus objective reviews. He said that if a subjective reviewer recommends a product and you buy it, you’re either going to like it, be ambivalent about the sound, or hate it and send it back. If you buy based on an objective/measurement review, you’re either going to like it, be ambivalent, or hate it and send it back. So what’s really the difference?  
Anyway- I thought it was an interesting point. 

chayro

The difference, potentially, is in the relative probabilities of those responses for each of the two situations.

I saw the video and it was interesting.  That’s one of the reasons I get more from reviewers that share both measurements and listening impressions.  Erin’s Audio Corner and James at Audioholics are 2 good examples.  I agree with his comments about finding someone that has similar tastes or ways of looking at components to use as a reliable resource.  

I read that too and thought he made some great points. The one I liked best was about a speaker review. He simply said every piece of equipment that the original music  goes through affects the final result. From the stylus, the cartridge, wires, phono amp, preamp, amps, interconnects to power cords and speakers. Change any one component and it’s “different “.  Not to mention room acoustics. The music or signal is the only consistent thing, the processing is the challenge and a moving target. And then there those including my self that suffer from listening to music at way to much volume in our youth that has compromised our hearing.