Some thoughts on dust covers


Over the course of time there have been many discussions concerning the subject of dust covers.  They tend to revolve around the central question:  Should the dust cover be down or up while playing records?  Some of these discussions have been nasty, consequently I have refrained from participation.  It is hoped that I can provide some common sense that was given to me by someone of unquestioned authority many years ago.  During college and after, from 1970 to ~1980 I worked in HiFi retail, selling high end lines of audio equipment.  One of these lines was Thorens.  Sometime around 1977 or 1978, if memory serves, Thorens introduced their new TD126, as a top of the line TT with their own arm and I sold the first one at our store to very good customer.  He came back very unhappy after the first night of frustration with it.  The problem was that with the dust cover closed some of his favorite records were hitting tangentally on the very back were the platter came closest to the dust cover when it was in the closed position.  I called the manufacturer's rep and he set up a three cornered phone call with himself, the Chief Engineer of Thorens at the time, and me.  I don't recall the man's name, but it doesn't matter, it is what he said that matters, then and now.  The Chief Engineer explained that the problem was caused because the hole in the offending records was slightly off center so there was an eccentricity as such a record rotates about the spindle.  The solution was simplicity itself, the dust cover should be removed always when playing records.  That the intent of the cover is to protect the turntable when not in use.  I pointed out that we lived in a semi-arrid environment (San Diego, CA) which is dusty to which he replied that if the environment was too dusty for records it should also be considered unhealthy for people to be breathing the air.  He recommended are filtration, not dust covers to address environmental concerns.  The rep asked about air bourne feedback from speakers and the Thorens guy laughed and said that if that was a problem in a given system, relying of the dust cover was a very flimsy and ineffective solution and that proper measures should be instituted to provide meaningful distance and isolation to ameliorate the problem.   So the often offered extremes:  a) Always play your records with the dust cover down, or b) put the dust cover away in it's box and never use it, should both be recognized for what they are are - not solutions at all.  First principles:  Identify the problem(s), seek solutions and alternatives, prioritize.

billstevenson

@lewm

You raise good questions.  Hopefully, some grad student somewhere will research the answers.  I have my beliefs/worries, but it's all speculative.

I think for all those who think using a dustcover is a panacea, turn out the lights and cast a UV light on the playing surface and tell me it's dust free. [hint: it isn't]

A lot of high end tables (like mine) don't really even support using a dustcover, during play or otherwise. After hundreds/thousands of hours of use without one it's just not an issue.

LP12 owner here : Dust Cover always on even when DSD64 ripping Vinyl. Why ? Dust and Dog hairs coming from my Garage and my two Dogs. Plus I hear ZERO difference with the cover up or down !

For 40 years (ok...I took a 6 year hiatus) LP spinner (my previous MoFi hadn o dust cover ....period) and Dual CS515 prior always played with the cover down.

That’s my take on the subject.

Happy New Year Everyone !

Ok everyone take a deep breath, go play a record.  Now do you feel better?  Do you know where your dust cover is?

‘richardbrand’ has a head start with the answer so far l think. Exposing a record for the least amount of time is paramount.  1 - 0 to Richard.