Which sounds better 2 way or 3 way speaker design


Seeking to purchase one of the following 3 speakers:

1. Proac K3-2 way design

2. Totem Element Metal V2-2 way design

3. Triangle Cello-3 way design

I am under the impression, (which I may be incorrect) that a three way design is superior to a 2 way design.  All of the above speakers listed below retail for about $18,000 per pair. Am I correct to assume that a 3 way design will give the listener a much better chance to hear the full audio spectrum as opposed to a 2 way design?

Thank you.  

 

128x128kjl1065

@toddalin 

I said ~80 Hz for the bottom of the midrange because the idea is to keep at least the fundamentals of the human voice within one driver and there are those who can certainly sing lower than that.

100% agree with this. Having the fundamental frequencies of vocal range produced by a single driver offers better coherency than splitting it between a woofer and midbass/midrange driver.  Of all the speakers I’ve designed, this philosophy sounds best to me. There are always other factors, but this makes more sense to me than installing a crossover in the middle of the vocal region… the vast majority of instruments also play in the same range, so it affects a lot of music. YG Acoustics offers some models that use similar logic. 

There is no inherent good/bad or superior/inferior re: 1,2,3 or more way. It depends on the skill and knowledge of the designer. As an example, when Klipsh came out with their new Jubilee top of the line speaker, they went from 3-way to 2-way.

I have been passionate about audio equipment, and speakers in particular, for around 20 years. During that time, I have gone through hundreds of written and spoken reviews, tens of listening rooms and, most importantly, I purchased 4 sets of speakers that I am using very actively.

From all that experience, my 1st grand conclusion is that the higher on the audiophile scale you go the less it matters how many drivers your speakers have; provided we are comparing apples-to-apples (i.e. bookshelf to same-size bookshelf).

To continue, I must make some generalization: “high on the audiophile scale” is directly correlated with “high on the price scale”. If we exclude extreme cases, that generalization works well, at least for me. As I have been constrained when it comes to funding the hobby, I had to operate below my personally defined level of “high”.

Based on all I learned, my 2nd grand conclusion is that well designed/built 3-way speakers outperform their well-designed/built 2-way brothers. Again, provided we compare apples-to-apples, and again, when we talk about the speakers below "high" area on the audiophile scale.

I cannot precisely pin-point the reason of the above, but having a mid-range driver makes subtle, but easy to notice advantage. My last purchase (2021) was actually 3-way bookshelf speakers. During my selection process I found 2-way speakers that could deliver the same quality sound. Both sets had nearly-identical parameters, though 3-way was 4” taller, due to the space needed for the mid-ranges. The choice was easy. Because the 3-way were coming from “lesser” brand, their price-tag was around 50% below the 2-way set, manufactured by a well-recognized and well-advertised powerhouse.

To round it up, if you can afford reaching higher on the scale, the 2 or 3 way will not matter. And a
side note: I decided not to name the brands/models as my goal is to provide an extra dimension to this, very interesting discussion and help those who are making the call between 2 and 2 way.

Cheers!

A lot will depend on the crossover. See Danny (GR Research) many YTVs showing how bad most well known speaker brands XOs are

I really like the designs with no midrange crossover but they are somewhat output limited. Again much easier to make a good 2 way which should have better time and phase characteristics. A dedicated midrange driver is both a blessing and a curse due to the crossover. Never could warm to the original Heil driver.