Bryston Model T Signature speakers


Anyone laid ears on the active-crossovered, tri-amped version?

https://www.soundstagehifi.com/index.php/equipment-reviews/579-bryston-model-t-loudspeakers

Thanks!

devinplombier

Active and active DSP are the way to go if were done tweaking and are ready to just enjoy the presentation, but not so much for those of us that like to continuously upgrade. 

I've heard the regular Model T as well as the Axiom M100 which I believe they are based on (or vice versa?). They were both enjoyable, I would say a little bit relaxed sounding, nice dynamics, focus on being smooth rather than ultra detailed, so they are good for a variety of music including lower quality recordings. I did think the Bryston option was noticeably better than the Axiom despite their similarities. I don't know what they do differently, maybe superior crossovers or bracing etc but it works.

Never heard the active version so can't comment on that. My one complaint is that I don't like the finish at these prices. They aren't necessarily ugly but I would expect more when paying this much.

My understanding is that the Model T Signature are 3-way active-crossovered but not powered. Users need to supply their own 6-channel amplification.

I think putting crossovers upstream of amplification makes a lot of sense. It also provides plenty of upgrading / tweaking opportunities as it lets you pick separate amps and match their character and sound signature to specific drivers and frequency ranges. In that sense the Brystons seem closer in spirit to some vintage Infinity or Apogee than modern active all-in-one speakers like Buchardt, KEF or Dutch & Dutch.

The M100 is listed at $4500 on Axiom’s website, whereas according to Bryston’s extraordinarily confusing website the Model T is discontinued, but it used to cost $12,000 when new. For that price difference you’d think the Brystons would sound better smiley