speaker upgrade fever


I'm considering a speaker upgrade to compliment my Aesthetix Mimas integrated. Currently, I've got KEF Ref 1 monitors paired with (2) REL S/3 subs. Must stay away from bright, analytical and clinical presentation. Room size 12'x19'. Music is jazz, acoustic Americana, Chamber, symphonic etc. 

Looking at the ProAc K1, Triangle Duetto and the DeVore o/baby. Also, a huge departure, Vandersteen Treo CT, floor standers. I understand Vandersteen pairs well with the Mimas.

Always open to suggestions, happy to buy quality used and demo.

Budget, ~$8-$11K

larseand

We are a kef dealer with loads of experience with themthe legacys are warmer and have similar clarity and sound staging the signatures will floor you 10k new in choice of finish  

Dave and Troy

AUDIO INTELLECT NJ

Kef and legacys dealer 

@richardbrand thanks for the feedback! I don't really understand what I missed but I admit, there are mistakes. It took me 100s of hours to download the data from terrible websites, no one ever responding to my email questions or telling me to go away. So it is working progress. 

I did not call them beercans ever. I think KEF is one of the best values. 

@grislybutter 

Oh, I had not realised it was your compilation! I assumed it was from a technical publication.

You are not the one who called them beercans, neither did you call them bookshelf speakers.  I have difficulty linking to responses to posters, especially mid-stream ...and I tend to read all posts, no matter who they might be addressed to.

I will admit that, as an electrostatic enthusiast, the Reference 1 design goes against many of my prior conceptions.  I thought boxes with parallel faces promoted standing waves.  I thought the volume under a stand-mount could be better used as cabinet volume.  I thought diffraction from cabinet edges was always a problem.  I thought you needed big drivers to move lots of air.  Most of all, I hated non-coincident drivers because of the cancellation effects off-axis.

The KEF white paper addresses these issues in ways I still find fascinating. For example, any cutout in the baffle can act as a diffraction point, so KEF designd the bass drivers to be as physically flat as possible in the plane of the baffle, to minimise diffraction of the coincident tweeter / midrange.  Who would have thought ...

I’ve a fair bit of seat time setting up two systems now with Mimas ( which is like all Jim White designs ) a very robust but neutral product …it is not bright. Both systems used the Treo CT which has a fantastic tweeter - reasonably flat to 30 khz. For your budget used you can get Quattro CT w built in subs, 11 bands of EQ below 120 hz … and a glorius midrange… you will need to have Aesthetix or your tech high pass tge Mimas. I’m a fan of the KEF also…  they have great engineers with ears also

The KEF Reference 1, as well as its bigger siblings, have been objectively measured to a very high degree of accuracy and are natively about as neutral a speaker as you can find.  The Reference family of speakers (excluding the 4c center channel, which has a bit more deviation with some rolled-off treble) is within 2dB of the reference level frequency. If you want a warmer tone, that's fine, and I'll second the Legacy Audio products as a great fit there, but if they are coming across as bright, that's far more likely the effect of your room and/or your electronics imparting that brightness. Before investing in new speakers, look at your space and see if you need to adjust your speakers' toe-in or put in some treatments to knock down the highs a bit.