If you go with a known 5mm error in pivot to spindle distance, then other compensations in overhang and headshell offset angle would have to be introduced, if you want alignment to conform to any typical algorithm. There are tables on line to help with making those compensations. It's relatively easy to change overhang, but estimating how much to twist the cartridge in the headshell (a method for altering effective headshell offset angle) is tricky to measure. Is it important? Most audiophiles would say yes. I'd say try it, but I would also say you are best off with the FR tonearm that has the same P2S as the OEM Lenco tonearm.
Audio Technica AT 1005 ii or Fidelity Research FR54?
I'm currently using the Audio Technica AT1005 ii arm on my upgraded Lenco L70. I bought the table without a tonearm and I read on the Lenco Heaven threads that the AT 1005 was a drop in replacement for the L70 arm. However, it appears that the pivot to spindle distance on the AT is 225mm whereas the ideal pivot to spindle distance on the L70 is 230mm. I was looking at perhaps trying the FR54 arm since it has a 230 pivot to spindle distance and they are relatively inexpensive. I'm using mainly a Rega Apheta 2 (medium compliance cart) and sometimes a Denon 103R (low compliance). The Rega is mounted on a lighter headshell than the Denon to try and maximize synergy with the heavy AT arm. Any opinions? Would I notice the 5 mm change in pivot to spindle? I can dial in my alignment just fine but the cartridges are definitely at the tip of the headshells. Would this be more of a lateral move in terms of quality of sound? I know there are better, more expensive options out there (groovetracer, schick) but I'm not ready to lay down that kind of money right now. Thanks
- ...
- 5 posts total
- 5 posts total