What is a "reference" system?


OK, most of us have an audio system, mine even works some of the time. But I see that some members have "reference" systems. This has to be better than the assorted junk that I have piled together. Probably a lot better than your rig as well.

But really, what distinguishes these folks "reference" systems from the pedestrian systems that the rest of us have? There must be something, or they could just save the keyboard time and drop the word when discussing their gear. And I am not referring to reviewers, that is a different story and one to examine more carefully in the future.

viridian

Good point by @rbstehno 

Would you buy a Marantz reference series component?

I have moved on from that many years ago. Their sound was always restrained, not engaging enough, making it very difficult to be able to evaluate the complexities of music sounds and their projection. You really need to lift the veil before you can use a system as "reference" imo.

What some call a reference system, one might also call it a baseline system.  I believe that is more descriptive of its status to the owner.

When I was in high school my reference system was the AM radio in the dashboard of a '50 Ford driving eight speakers stolen from drive-in movie theaters.

@fastfreight 

 

like most things in audio, it’s a bs term, loaded with subjectivity.  To me it means the most in the context of a professional reviewer.  As in “…compared to my reference DAC, DAC X sounds…”

A "reference" system is your stereo system at home home that you reference when you are unsuccessfully trying to hit on that hot blonde at the bar. Seriously, it is a system so resolving and familiar to the owner that he can swap in a single piece of gear and immediately hear the differences in its sound quality from the piece that it replaced.