Critical listening and altered states


Ok, this is not a question about relaxing, but about listening to evaluate how the system (or a piece of gear is sounding).

What, in your experience, are the pluses and minuses of altering your state of mind for listening? This can include anything you've used to affect your everyday state of mind, from coffee, beer, scotch, tobacco, to much stronger — and psychoactive, dissociative — additives.

What do you gain by altering your consciousness in terms of what you notice, attend to, linger on, etc?
What causes more details to emerge?
What allows you to stick with a thread or, alternately, make new connections?

Or perhaps you like to keep all those things *out* of your listening; if that's you, please say a bit about why.

hilde45

A  deep acoustic Koan for my friend asvjerry:

smiley

What is the sound of a bell ringing in a cage with no air ?

 

 

 

 

 

A clue for the meditation:

A wave is not necessarily a perceived sound and a perceived sound is not a mere wave in the air. The vibrating sound source is the qualia we perceive as a meaningful information about the vibrating sound source state itself which is not only frequencies but a recognized vibrating physical qualia. We tap a fruit to know if it is ripe or not.

Sound is meaning.Not just waves.

 

 

 

 

Pink Floyd - Run Like Hell (PULSE Restored & Re-Edited)  

looping....

Talking perception, and the filters of the mind with that of the ears....

@ 3:27....I hear "and the m.....f..... closed the door!"

....kinda like that, I'll run with the mistake....*L*

 

No you are wrong here.

Sigh. Wrong again. Ok, I give up.

Instead, a koan:

The words all flow,
Yet meaning hides in the prose,
Mind in tangled knot.

And a limerick:

There once was a poster online,
Whose temper was awfully inclined
To flare at a tweet,
Then stomp tiny feet,
And call his profundity divine.
 

 

Sigh. Wrong again. Ok, I give up.

Instead, a koan:

The words all flow,
Yet meaning hides in the prose,
Mind in tangled knot.

And a limerick:

There once was a poster online,
Whose temper was awfully inclined
To flare at a tweet,
Then stomp tiny feet,
And call his profundity divine.
 

 

 

Yes, you were wrong again...

Because you insinuated  that i had claimed that my system was without defects nor limitations..

I explained why this is false...

 Acoustics do not replace  high end gear...

it only optimized  piece of gear this is why the concept of acoustic balance matter over price...You cannot replace acoustics basics with more costly gear upgrade... Design of gear and acoustics are 2 different matter... It is common place fact...Suggesting that i claimed the opposite is "bad faith"...You cannot replace better designed gear improvement by acoustics improvement...

 

 

To save your face now you throw me sarcasms and innuendos as usual..

I called that  "petty mind"...

 

 

A poem for you  :

It was  poetical bits 
from your " text corrector" turn of mind pit
Your cold head bits  had beaten
the best from my hot heart beats...
It was my fate...
 Enjoy bad faith....