2. digital
  3. 1284870627

Debate on a whole front end change

I am currently in a debate with my old man on selling a portion of his front end setup and use the savings to buy a new pair of speakers and also get an improvement in sound at the same time from the benefit of better speakers and better front end.

The benefit of better speakers is no dispute, but he considers my recommended setup as a strong downgrade.

He currently has a Denon "cost-is-no object" top loading CD Player (don't recall the exact model), Theta Gen VIII v2 preamp, Jeff Rowland Model 7 mono amps, ML Descent-I sub x2 and ML CLS speakers conditioned with PS audio PPP x2 and Kimber Select cabling throughout

The sound is intoxicating and the noise floor is pitch black. Any time I get a chance to visit I am always impressed how well his front end makes the CLS shine.

My recommendation is the following setup:

PS Audio PWD = 3000
PS Bridge = 800
Ethernet cable = 100 (for a good one)
2TB NAS hard drive = 200
Ipod remote/play list controller = 200
PnP app for ipod = 9.95

4309.95 Total

Beside the money that could be used to upgrade your speakers "SIGNIFICANTLY" this setup would benefit your setup in several ways:

1) 7,000.00 - 11,000.00 SAVINGS!!!
2) Less AC draw
3) Consolidated CD library via NAS hard drive
4) Playlist creation ability and not need to switch discs EVER

.....now the above mentioned are just conveniences that do not affect sound.

5) Native sampling = RAW 100% uncompressed data with no error correction = the ability to use the DAC 192/32 Khz if so desired. No jitter and less information lost via cd to IC to preamp.

So at this point he disagrees without explanation suffice to say that this is a downgrade. I am not avid audiophile and therefore cannot explain anything scientifically to him and I know just how good his front end products are but feel the change would be for the better.

Would like to know the thoughts of the community.

Regards,

-Joshua
masongsong
rrog
1,958 posts
 
It sounds like your father knows what he is doing. The CLS is an amazing speaker. I still regret selling mine. I too thought I was going to get much better sound since I replaced them with a much more expensive speaker. I was wrong and I'm still kicking myself. So, is it the front end making the CLS shine or is it the other way around?

Call me old fashioned, but my two channel stereo system is sacred and I will never incorporate a computer or HT with that system. I don't want my music stored on a hard drive and I will never own an ipod. That's for kids to listen to with headphones.

You admitted yourself how amazing your father's system sounds. Why fix something that isn't broke? It may never be the same.
masongsong OP
13 posts
 
@Rrog - No matter how good your front end is a lousy speaker will sound lousy. Many audiophiles like yourself know that this was an advanced speaker for it's time that still kicks butt even today. Between the two the clear winner is the front end. As much detail and midrange the CLS delivers it still has issues (as all ML's do) of playing classical and matching the dynamics of a full range loudspeaker. Not to mention needed a separate sub and most don't compare.

Too bad old school mentality is still running through your veins. Why don't you stop using the internet and go back to pen, paper, and dialing the operator....? LOL! The comparison of not embracing this new tech is no different. You will eventually :)
rrog
1,958 posts
 
This topic has been debated here many times and most audiophiles believe the speaker is more important than the source. However, I am not one of them.
I agree the CLS has its share of problems and all speakers do. I learned a long time ago there is not a single speaker for every type of music.

Old school mentality is in fact running through my veins. There have been many times I wished I could go back to pen and paper and I will never embrace the new technology for music.

You need to learn a little more before you realize how much you don't know.
More to discover