How did U get into this expensive hobby?


So I was up last night listening to my system and thought to myself, when am I going to be 100% satisfy with my set up. Just for once I like to listen without thinking well maybe if I can add this or remove that I can improve on this or that area. A mist all that I thought how did I ever got into this hobby any way? Well, the nightmare began for me when I was working in my college university's periodical section. We had over 3000+ magazines on file. The first stereo magz I ever picked up was the AUDIO annual price list which was about 300 or so pages of all major audio mfg. and models..also known as the audio bible; what ever happened to Audio magazine anyway? I remembered being so intrigued by so many brands that I have never heard of before and how the workmanship and industrial design seemed so much far superior than the average Kenwood and Pioneer back then (no offense to Kenwood and Pioneer owners). This was 10 years ago and I started by scraping every pennies I had to purchase my first NAD integrated amp. Although 10 years have passed, I am still scraping for money to own something new every now and then, but this time instead of pennies, it's dimes a nickels since my tasted have upgrade with my salery. It'd be interesting to hear how some of you fellow audigoners got started in this hobby. Upon adding to this thread, you'll find that you'll get a little grin on your face after spilling your guts out on how you began on this deep pocket journey and how far you have come. Happy Holidays guys and gals.
3chihuahuas
It's my dads' fault.

In 1955-56 (?) my dad set-up a mono radio (on the ironing board), and we all sat between it and the TV, to watch/listen to Ed Sullivan broadcast a "stereo" television program. One of the sounds was Sputnik crossing between the speakers.

In 1963 he got a Sony reel-to-reel from Japan, through an uncle that was in the Merchant Marine. The sound was (in my memory) amazing. I have great memories of Camelot and My Fair Lady tapes. My mom used to put a tape of Suza Marches on, crank up the volume, and clean the house like a woman possessed.

In high school, I installed a 4-track in my car. Tape availability lasted about 15 minutes, which led to an 8-track, which led to cassette.

In the Army, I had the best system in the barracks. Gerrard turntable, and Pioneer receiver and speakers. Deep down I'm still mad at that SOB that put the cigarette burn mark, in the plastic dust cover.

In college I was relagated to OP's (other peoples), but started collecting albums.

After college, I married a university schlorship trained, professional opera singer, with perfect pitch, who had no interest in listening to music. Indeed, she had/has not the slightest clue what music can do to, and for, a person. She did have the remarkable ability to spend every penney I ever made, often before I made them. Twentyfive years of silence followed my voluntary enslavement.

Now free, I am building a system, listening to great music, and enjoying every minute of it.
I won't bore you with how I got started because everybody else has done such a good job, but I will tell you I used to go through the same "if I did this or that to my system...." Here is how I stopped doing that; Scotch on Friday after work! Of course now I weigh more than I did when I just worried about my system (I wonder if that's the booze) but I enjoy my stereo more. Just a thought.
Jim, what's your "audiophile approved" scotch? I find that Lagavulin, appropriately tweaked, brings pace to the system -- and much better imaging; the less I can focus, the better the imaging! Cheers.
Well, to Greg, I prefer Delwinnies or Cardu; do you know them? (I'm sure you do)
It's interesting that this subject has not been explored before because it is integrel to listening I find. Especially on a Friday nite after a tough week at work.
Perhaps Greg & I can be sponsored by a Scotch distillery to perform exhaustive research on this important subject; "The relative effect of different types of Scotch on the Audiophile system" I should think we could wrap it up in about 10 years.
Jim, you speak for me. Indeed, as Guiness/UDV is the marketer for both Lagavulin & Cardhu -- maybe even Dalwinnie, we can wrap it up in a single deal. They're the lucky ones! For the initial phases of this research of paramount importance, let's settle for a case, each, of *their* recommended malts; then we'll move on to other raw material, for the sake of this research.
We must, of course, conduct a variety of time-based experiments, Friday nite being one option, Monday, Sunday or even Wednesday, being others... We're talking serious, global research, here.
We'll have to choose representative music -- say, 3 cd's worth (maybe A'gon members can help propose titles).

Ofcourse, the systems will have to be comparable, but not identical -- for the sake of our research; so, maybe the upper end of hi-end manufacturers can chip in (not expecting the 1tonne Avalons, Soundlabs, or similar; but the simple likes of $50k FM Acoustics, Jadis, Tenor, etc gear that isn't space consuming, could do).

Don't you think we can also get Harvard or MIT to support this? They're well-off, aren't they, and we're putting in all the hard work...
Cheers!