Overall, I would say Moravec for power, Michelangeli for precision, Entremont for lyricism,
What you call power , i call expression; and expressive power is the main thing in playing as "timbre perception" is the main thing in audio, not details perception promoted by sellers ignoring acoustics...I dont want to taste music i want to be possessed by it...
I like Scriabin because almost no pianist nevermind most virtuoso are unable to play him at all ...Scriabin is a God beside Bach, Mozart Beethoven Josquin Des Prez and some others as Liszt whom almost no pianist could play really too ...
MIchelangeli is "perfect" like Hamelin is...But i want to be moved not just esthetically pleased...I want a pianist who tell me a story whose images i can see like in a movie...Moravec do so more than anyone here and he can makes "feux d’artifice" speaks and sings not only be seen ...try his Chopin nocturnes... Only Rubinstein rival him in fluid expression they are my Chopin choices...
Perfection is often only a flattening of the necessary imperfection, a flat wall with no movie.A dripping mountain eroded to be a dry plain.
"Imperfection is the peak" René Char
The same is true if we compare Michelangeli with Moravec in the "cathédrale engloutie", here note the "pulse" the internal rythm in Moravec 3-D playing as if it was a song and a movie:
Moravec
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlDyXZ74kf0&list=RDPlDyXZ74kf0&start_radio=1
Michelangeli
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsdIkUSjXv8
Musical time is not linear, it cannot be measured but only felt as a singing and spoken quality or as a walking abyss, the perfect note one after the other dont make music...I learn this listening Furtwangler...Unparallel maestro ...Try Schumann fourth symphony, a radiography of Schumann soul , perhaps one greatest album ever recorded beside few others.