Well, I went from a Topping D70s to a Lampizator Poseidon. The linked analysis comparing a Rolex to a Timex is unfair and inaccurate. All one is seeking in a timepiece is the correct time keeping. In DACs, it's sound quality and that varies significantly although not 50X or even 2X. There is no reason to use a $25K DAC in a mid-fi system. I chose this DAC after auditioning the speakers with the SOTA Horizon $50K DAC. It also serves as an additional pre-amp with an RCA and full digital inputs. I have a high resolution system, not for the detail but for the additional musical expression, the added subtleties that so many recordings have hidden on lesser resolving systems. Yes, it is a costly, heavy and large DAC but worth it in my system with no bragging rights. My back up Topping is a uniquely excellent DAC with reportedly many others in the sub $2.5K realm, even one Greg Weaver touts for $200? My CD transport and cabling enable me to maximally etract more music from my CDs. They are each $5K each. The Shanling ET3 back-up is $729 and a bargain for it's high quality. My Jay's Audio CDt3 Mk3 is also large and heavy but has superior damping build quality whereas the Shanling is a tiny lightweight device with a big glass top clamp.
So, no, DACs are not similar and can vary in sonic ability to retrieve more music by price unlike watches whose primary job is to keep accurate time.