Al, I've never done the math or quantitatively measured bandwidths, but from what I have seen I suspect your real world estimates to be reasonable.
Wireless n probably also does not always perform to the max based on teh spec but I would expect perhaps still a significant improvement over g in practice.
I have a wireless n router but my server and players are all wireless G, so I have not really leveraged the current wirless n technology in practice to date.
Again, just to be clear for all, these are limitations that determine how fast digital data can move through the digital wireless "pipeline" as input to the Squeezebox. Jitter is not a phenomena that pertains to transmission of dogital data. Jitter comes into play during the DAC process. Data input to the DAC process is provided by the Squeezebox, regardless of whether the SB's internal built in or an external DAC is used.
Wireless n probably also does not always perform to the max based on teh spec but I would expect perhaps still a significant improvement over g in practice.
I have a wireless n router but my server and players are all wireless G, so I have not really leveraged the current wirless n technology in practice to date.
Again, just to be clear for all, these are limitations that determine how fast digital data can move through the digital wireless "pipeline" as input to the Squeezebox. Jitter is not a phenomena that pertains to transmission of dogital data. Jitter comes into play during the DAC process. Data input to the DAC process is provided by the Squeezebox, regardless of whether the SB's internal built in or an external DAC is used.