This whole debate is just like a runaway train.
l have never had a problem integrating a sub into my various set ups with multiple changes of amps and floor/stand mount speakers. Maybe by just good luck, or the hand of fate in buying the right models that by mere chance worked for me.
The first was a near bottom of the range Rel Quake in 2004 with a meagre 100watt power handling. The step up in quality and soundstage led to a second buy to make a stereo pair in 2006. They certainly punched anbove their weight. Onward to a Rel T7 200watt after one of the Quakes transformers failed after 15 years. Surprisingly the experiment with the second hand larger sub paid off and it blended in effortlessly.
Today l run two Rel T9i’s in the same sized room and l’m as happy as a lark. I know it’s all been Rel on this journey, but if all this was a pure chance success thing to go by…. Buy a Rel or two and always wire through Hi Level Input for two channel. I never went down the room treatments path as l was content with just correct placement. It’s been the right choice for me, and l’m never thinking of, do l need to upgrade again all the time.
One thing l have learnt with well integrated subs is how much lower volume l need to listen to music. Lots of people will say subs mean higher sound levels and annoying neighbours. Not true. Without subs many with inefficient speakers play music too loud to reproduce the base they are missing.