New CDP or new DAC?


One of the weak links in my system is my NAD C542 CDP, which when I bought it was a recommended budget CDP. In the new Stereophile Sam Tellig was extremely taken with the Music Fidelity M1DAC. So the question which occurred to me was whether it would be better to buy a new, better CDP, or to use my existing CDP as a transport and feed the signal to a new DAC instead (i.e. assume that, for example, the M1DAC is significantly better than the NAD's internal DAC). Also, if the recommendation is to go the DAC route, the NAD would let me use either a coax or optical cable to connect to the DAC - any preferences? So, I guess I have two questions: CDP or DAC, and if DAC, which connection path to the DAC? Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
palewin
I would also say DAC through coax for the reasons cited above (flexibility to use both transport and computer-based or music server down the road). The one caveat is that you should seek out DACs that have very strong jitter reduction. I don't believe Sam Tellig commented about the jitter reduction technology in the M1DAC nor did he use with a bunch of different transports to make sure that it mates well with a wide variety of transports. So I would definitely try it out first in your system with your NAD CDP as transport before pulling the trigger.
Hello,
I once owned a c542. Found the redbook playback to be only slightly better than my 19 year old NAD 5000. The HDCD playback was impressive however. I recently purchased a AUNE dac/headphone amp new from flea bay and using it behind the archiac NAD 5000 cd player. Very happy with the DAC and noted a considerable improvement over the internal DAC. The DAC has USB port too which is nice. A great value for $165, shipped.
I say it depends on if you would be planning to use the DAC with a computer server at some point. If you only ever plan to play CDs one at a time then I'd say get a new CD player. There are some incredible deals on used CD players these days since the trend is to go towards a computer based server and DAC. I personally have no use for a CD player ever again but some guys are old fashioned and just want to play their discs and are happy doing it that way. Good for them I say and good for the guys who still like to play vinyl too.
DACs give you more flexability in that you can connect several sources. If you only see yourself using one digital source, that's not an advantage.

Dollar for dollar, I've found DACs sound better than CDPs. Less stuff in the box means more sound quality per dollar; at least in theory anyway.

I've had the Rega DAC in my system for a little evr a months now. It easily beat out my Rega Apollo, which cost the same amount. The DAC does everything the Apollo does (except make me get up to change CDs) a good bit better.

As far as coax vs toslink, it depends on the transport. Some stuff is noisy electrically, and toslink works better due to no electrical connection to pollute. Toslink can introduce more jitter to the system if not done right/the right cable. Trade offs, just like everything else. Anyone who says coax is always better than toslink hasn't heard enough of a variety of transports and good toslink cables IMO. There's no one right way to do anything, and every rule has exceptions. Your ears should be the judge, not Sam Tellig's or anyone else's.

Not a fan of Musical Fidelity at all, personally. Take anyone's opinion with a grain of salt. I'm sure you've heard gear that wowed a ton of people, yet fell on its face to your ears. I know I have.

The 542 is a very good CDP, or at least it was in its day. Make sure what you get is a good step forward and/or a step forward in every way, not just one or two things are better. That can be said for any new piece IMO.

Also, if you're looking to improve things and are prepared to throw money at it, make sure everything's set up right - placement, acoustics, etc. before doing so. No point in buying something new and not getting your money's worth because the room sounds like crap.

Just some food for thought.

Cheapest and shortest path?
New CDP. Period.
No additional IC to buy… no added worries as to the power cord on the DAC either.

My plan? Do Both…. IF….

IF you aren’t spending heavily on the CDP, especially. Transports do matter but you gotta really step up the donation at the ‘Transport store’ to really see gains there. My former Sony SCD 777 ($3K) and a known as a very good transport if not a great one, was maybe 20% or less better sounding than my $175 Oppo DV 980H, using both a Bel Canto DAC III, and a Lavry D10.

There was about eight years of tech gains across that span inside the Oppo. The Sony was made in 2001. soooooo…. Also, my Sony required a motor and laser replacement after five or six years of ‘go to’ near daily use too.

For DACs. Especially those with a wealth of interfaces, and great jitter reduction significant gains can be had just adding one of them… and a cable or two.

DACs are a nice spot to go for immediate improvements in sound quality…. IF, again, it has great jitter reduction prowess… and if picked out might aid you down the road, should use of a file playback system is desired.

Digital world revolves really fast, So, a new CDP could be the one box solution

But, If DAC, definitely Coax…

If nice CDP & DAC…. BNC, or AES cables.