LINN Akurate DS vs. ANY CD PLAYER

I'm still not totally clear on the DS pieces (and I'm a Linn guy). What makes them different than having a computer-based system playing through a high quality DAC? I casually demoed a DS at the local Linn dealer when I was there for something else. I won't mention the dealer, but they were actually playing me mp3 files over the DS! I would think Linn HQ would have a fit if they found out their dealers were doing that. Point being, I couldn't tell how good the DS was.

Nothing, really. You could build Klimax DS functionalities (don't have Akurate DS)using a server + Transporter + dCS or any of the other $15k DACs out there. The downside is that there will be more jitter in the system than using your Linn DS alone (may be you can hear this, may be not), not to mention the cost of an extra one or two digital cables and power cables. So you may or may not actually save any money going multi-box route, but it will certainly not sound better.

I personally don't mind listening to mp3 (320kps) using Klimax DS. It sounds a whole lota more analog and musical than the same CD played back on the CDP that Klimax replaced. Yes, mp3s sound great, CDs sound amazing and hi-res sounds heavenly.

Seriously, one box, and you are done - what's not to like.

Chesebert: Klimax playing MP3's? *s* I know what you mean though, if you are listening to Linn's internet radio stations as 320kps it is actually quite good and only gets better as you up the resolution.

Mateored: All you need to do is go and listen to one of these boxes with at least 16/44 files running through them and you will understand all the fuss. I'm assuming you have read their explanations on it?
http://docs.linn.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Why_Linn_DS_is_the_best_way_to_play_CDs