Lossless Files Vs CD's

Electroslacker: The analogy of ripping to a Xerox copy is in audio dimension, not in digital one. I.e. it just to give a hint to all of you what specific loss of SQ i'm complaining about and what you should look for when comparing CD to files. I'm on my way to T.H.E. Show. Talk later.

I have not done extensive AB comparisons to listen to the difference between CD and lossless files of the same source material, so, my own experience is limited and not of the apples-to-apples variety. But, I have at least heard implementations involving the same brand, so presumably there at least is a bit more similarity between gear. I own a Naim CD 555 CD player and a Naim NDS server system. The Naim NDS system rips all CDs to WAV files, which I store on a 6TB QNap NAS. As for my personal preference, I actually like the sound of the CD 555 more (slightly warmer and with less brittle sound), though both are quite decent. The convenience and easy access to my entire collection (4,000 CDs) makes me NOT want to plug the CD 555 back into my system.

As between WAV and FLAC files, I heard a comparison of a CD ripped to WAV and to FLAC (on a thumb drive) and it was quite easy to hear the difference--the WAV file was better (I could not control for the difference between storage/retrieval from the NAS and from the thumb drive).

I have heard good sound from both computer-based and CD spinner based systems, so I don't think that the differences are so large that one is CLEARLY superior to the other. Moreover, I find that differences between models of DACs, particularly with respect to the kind of analogue output stages and filterless v. filtered/oversampling DACs makes a big difference, moreso than CD v. server or even CD v. SACD.

I have done enough comparisons myself to be convinced there is no significant difference between CD resolution lossless files ripped accurately by software designed to rip in a manner that properly validates the data read before writing.

I lose no sleep over this.

There is a lot that goes into creating a good digital music library from various sources though, especially non-digital ones like vinyl and tape. I have lost some sleep probably at some time trying to make that process both fast and efficient.

CD ripping is a slam dunk these days though.

The trip to T.H.E. show was complete waste as I expected. Apparently, Steeven (“Audiogoner”) commented on my posts without even having neither ability nor desire to compare "apples to apples" i.e. his “highly tweaked” comp/ripper does not have ability to playback CDs, only files, hence one can’t compare SQ of files to CD playback played from the same computer (which was my original comment about.). However, after coming back from show, I decided to do very final experiment just to be absolutely sure in what I’m saying, i.e. that SQ of ripped files indeed inferior to the SQ of the same cuts played back from the same CD/CDROM. This time I finally downloaded AccurateRip soft, which was suggested by many Audiogoners, but was, for some error on my part, not available to me on my Mac Book pro, hence I mostly used ITunes for the ripping hence all my prior comments were based on such experience. So, I downloaded AccuRip to my PC and did some ripping and comparing using headphones directly to computer analog out. Yes, SQ of files ripped using AccurateRip is significantly!!! better than those ripped on ITunes and now was almost (not 100% though) identical to the sound of CD. However files were still slightly less transparent compared to the CD playback and I still can blindly tell the difference if listening in headphones. However, all other problems, complained about by me earlier, i.e. voice timbre change, noticeable loss of extensions and transparency etc., were no longer there. Does that mean that my I-5, “no fan” PC, hooked by Illuminati I-90 cable to my Reimyo777 DAC beats or at least matches my (hundred years old, but finally fixed)) Teac VRDS-10 used as transport to the same Reimyo 777 ? No way! Not even close! Once again, to me, computer as a transport/player does make a sense only for free digital music downloads or as non-stop, rendom playing device (it freezes time to time though)) for non-critical listening.

Dvavc, Steve and I have both indicated multiple times in our earlier posts that the methodology you have used in your comparisons of CD playback with your computer vs. file playback with your computer, to quote one of my statements:

... cannot distinguish between effects occurring during the ripping process and effects occurring during the playback process. Yet he attributes the differences he perceived to the ripping process, even though (as we've both explained) it is entirely expectable and technically explainable that differences will be introduced during playback, and entirely unexpectable and technically inexplicable that differences will be introduced during a properly implemented rip.

In other words, that comparison is not apples to apples, as you continue to claim. Somehow that point seems to not be getting across.

Regards,
-- Al