2. digital
  3. 1350235161

Looking for hi value CD/SACD player...

I think my modified Denon 2910, which has served me well, is dying. I would greatly appreciate suggestions on a replacement in the $1000-$1500 range. Obviously, spending less is OK too but new rather than used. I'd prefer a dedicated CD/SACD player exclusively for 2 channel audio listening. Don't need Blue Ray or multichannel capability. 2 players that I'm considering are the Oppo BDP 95 and Sony's SCD XA5400SE. The Oppo gets high marks on audio but carries video baggage I don't really need. The Sony seems designed for audio but is a bit older than the Oppo. Has anyone compared these? What were your findings? Both have been out for several years now. Is there something newer to consider in this price range? Thanks in advance.
128x128ghosthouse
doggiehowser
672 posts
 
I have the SA8003 which I thought sounded overly warm for my taste. The SA KI Lite IMHO is a better machine and it's based off the 8004 but seems more dynamic.
mrtennis
3,295 posts
 
there is another thread regarding the latest oppos--the 103 and 105. perhaps the 103 should be considered as well.
ghosthouse's avatar
ghosthouse OP
4,307 posts
 
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions.
johnnyb53
3,510 posts
 
Another +1 for the Marantz SA8004. I'm a vinyl junkie, yet in a store demo I heard the SA8004 make a redbook CD I was very familiar with sound stunningly real, lush, rich, and musical. To be able to tap other digital sources into that excellent DAC is a compelling additional benefit.
mrtennis
3,295 posts
 
i owned the marantz sa 11 mark 2. i'm not sure i have the model number correct, but it was the second most expensive sacd, about two years ago. i am assuming it is more expensive than the 8004.

point is, i have never heard a solid state sacd player sound warm and lush. perhaps it is the way in which the terms are defined, but i think tubes are required to attain a rich and lush sound. beware of solid state.

i sold my marantz player and vowed never to buy another.

i'd suggest that you find a consonance 2.2 that works, if you can.
More to discover