$800 Cartridge Shootout and Upgrade Path



I am putting together an analog system, starting with the cartridge. I like a well-balanced sound with a slightly lush midrange and excellent extension at the frequency extremes. The cartridge should be a reasonably good tracker. Here are my choices:

1. Dynavector Karat 17D MkII
2. Shelter 501
3. Sumiko Black Bird
4. Grado Statement Master
5. Clearaudio Virtuoso Wood

Which one comes closest to my wish list? Which one would you choose?

Here are the upgrade cartridges to the above list, one of which would be purchased later:

1. Shelter 901
2. Benz Micro L2
3. Grado Statement Reference
4. Koetsu Black

Which one comes closest to my wish list? Which one would you choose?

Now, which turntable/tonearm combination (for new equipment up to $4,500) would you choose to handle a cartridge from the first group and the upgrade cartridge from the second group?

Any help you can provide is greatly welcomed. Thanks!
artar1
Chris, you are going the right way, by auditioning these different things. Nobody can tell you what is "right for you", except you. We can only make suggestions based on what our past experiences have been, and we don't have your system and listening environment here at our homes.

To find your "Goldilock's" products which sound "just right" will require your listening to various things to see what makes the most impact on your listening sensitivities.

That is the best way to proceed.

Regarding your GPA amp stand, I have no doubt that it was a nice sounding addition to your system. However, sometimes there are some differences in the applications, like turntables vs amps. And again, there are differences in listening tastes.

One day, call me up and get one of the Sistrum stands to listen to. We'll be happy to take it back if you don't like it. I'm betting you'll keep it. I have an extremely high resolution and very dynamic audio system, with analog-only source, state-of-the-art SET OTL amp, and 100db sensitivity speakers, all battery powered, which will resolve the most hidden details that are below most other system's noise floors. I use Sistrum and Audiopoints under everything, and I don't have to do it just because I work for them. I do it because the sound improvement is significant. I gained an extra db and a half of headroom, just by using this stuff. My already good dynamics were improved quite a bit, detail was even better, and everything was more "in focus". The results of the Sistrum platforms under my speakers was amazing. All cabinet resonances that caused some of the colorations was eliminated, and resulted in an extraordinary improvement in my speaker performance. The Audiopoints vs the BDR cones that came standard with my Teres TT, was much in favor of the Audiopoints. And these are both rigid type points. I've had superb results from this stuff in my system, and that was why I went to work for Starsound.
Twl,

After I demo the GPA I will give you a call, give me the number. I'll ask for Twl the Audio guru. Seriously I greatly appreciate the feedback that I've gotten from you and others. I should give Sistrum a try, I've got nothing to lose but the shipping which is neglible.

BTW, I am familiar with your system and am anxiously awaiting for you to finally post a photo of your custom made beauty!

I am very interested in what you say about Sistrum and speakers as well. I'll look at the website and see what the options are.
I have used BDR cones extensively and have found them better than the brass cones that I used before but I have not tried Audiopoints. I was getting good results with BDR so I felt satisfied in that respect but, there's always more performance to tweak out of a system.

When I get the GPA I'll also experiment with the turntable on and off the Bright Star, that will also give me some data on what's going on with the rack. Though it's a suspended table, it'll have to do. I won't be buying my new table until next year so no testing with a Teres(or a Galibier) for now.

Thanks,
Chris

Chris,

I understand your situation with the Galibier. Their top-of-the-line model really catches my fancy, only eclipsed by the Redpoint tables and the most expensive ones coming from Transrotor and La Luce. As you know, however, I can’t play in those leagues. I will never have the money to buy something like that.

If you go with a Teres, you will need to go with the finished cocobolo 255; otherwise, you will be required to do some finishing work. Now the Teres web site claims only a couple of hours are required; I am skeptical of that assertion. From the Teres 160 pictures, it looks like the acrylic parts also need to be polished. If that’s true, I think a polishing wheel will be needed.

The Schroeder is a well-respected arm. If you have your heart set on it, you might as well get it. But it does look a little temperamental and perhaps somewhat difficult to install. For me the price is a major barrier.

I agree that a good rack is essential. I have a reasonably decent one from Bell’Ogetti, but it is not audiophile quality. I wanted to build one myself, but my wife talked me out of it. I believe that one can build a very sturdy and reasonably good sounding rack from scratch for a fraction of what some of the more exotic ones cost. But then you will need the tools and the time to complete the project.

On several occasions you mentioned going back to school. What program will you be enrolling in?
Artarl,

Finishing a Teres hardwood base really does take only a few hours. Of course the whole process takes a few days because you need to let the finish dry between coats of tung oil. But each coat only takes 10-15 minutes and the initial sanding is trivial and usually is not needed at all. The 200 series turntables have hardwood armboards that just need the same finish as the base.

For the 150 and 160 it takes a little more effort because the acrylic armboard needs to be sanded and polished. The armboard polishing is still less than an hour even if you don't have a buffer.

All of the other parts are ready to go and don't need any work.

Chris