What time do you wear?

Misunderstanding? I believe the point people are bringing up is that when you spend a substantial amount of money, you reasonably expect prestige AND higher performance (accuracy)- much like audio components.

Who will admit to buying a component strictly for prestige or appearance when knowing its performance is substandard to others at a much lower price point? Isn't performance the ultimate reason for the investment and the resultant prestige a la Ferrari, Porsche, Fountain powerboats, Gulfstream jets, and (insert your favorite) audio components?

My "big name" not-inexpensive quartz watch has exquisite design, fine materials, outstanding features AND virtually unmatched performance - that's my criteria for spending big $ for a watch anyway.

I simply disagree Snofun. If someone is purchasing an automatic watch expecting the utmost accuracy they are misled. As for "higher performance", that can come in other forms. Most expensive watches are built very well and last for decades. Furthermore, many people, such as myself enjoy owning a mechanical watch.

I did not purchase my automatics for prestige, I don't care who likes them nor do I think they are "substandard" because they are not as accurate as my quartz watches.

It is wonderful that you are pleased with your watch and it meets your criteria, but others can be just as happy that have a different criteria than you.

If accuracy is your main criteria, purchase an Atomic watch.

As I mentioned, "exquisite design, fine materials, outstanding features AND virtually unmatched performance" was my purchase criteria.
Your criteria is different - no problem.

"exquisite design, fine materials, outstanding features AND virtually unmatched performance"

All in the eyes of the beholder. Again, glad your happy, that's all that matters.

An old Omega Seamaster, that was passed down from my grandfather when he passed.