All things being equal (which of course they never are), original, or even close to original, pressings are going to sound better than vinyl re-issues almost all of the time.
I am not disputing you are wrong, just why it should be true. If and its a big if, the reissue label has access to master tapes, then surely there are many reasons why the new issue should be better: 180/200gm pressings
Probably higher quality vinyl
Simply being newer, less degeneration, unless vinyl, like wine, improves with age and I doubt that
Greater care in mastering and cutting for "prestige Audiophile pressings,
If new records are nearly always worse, it seems the only answer is the mastering source, the tape has deteriorated with age or is not a master tape.
Just musimg out loud, but asking why new is'nt as good as origonal pressings.
I am not disputing you are wrong, just why it should be true. If and its a big if, the reissue label has access to master tapes, then surely there are many reasons why the new issue should be better: 180/200gm pressings
Probably higher quality vinyl
Simply being newer, less degeneration, unless vinyl, like wine, improves with age and I doubt that
Greater care in mastering and cutting for "prestige Audiophile pressings,
If new records are nearly always worse, it seems the only answer is the mastering source, the tape has deteriorated with age or is not a master tape.
Just musimg out loud, but asking why new is'nt as good as origonal pressings.