Why vinyl?

Well I am definitely a fan of vinyl. For a number of years I, too, only bought CDs (well a few records here and there). I know this is a familiar story but I just listened to music a lot less as time went on. When I got back into listening to music part of the reason was that I was back into vinyl. A new amp and speakers and now I listen to music all the time.

I was lucky in that I never sold my TT or my records so I still have them all.

That said I still listen to CDs, they still give me great musical experiences. I just prefer vinyl, it just sounds better. Oh, and the fun of having vinyl and taking care of it is part of the experience too.

DS

Les, in a sense, analogue also suffers from resolution limits, for example, the tape that is used cannot resolve the sound to smaller discrete packages than the size of the magnetic particles on the tape. And, of course, the playback of the tape is really just an integration (reassembling)of discrete particles of information into a coherent ensemble. The math behind the digital is superior to the 'mechanical' method of integration used by analogue.
Nyquist theory, anyone?

Bob P.

I think if they just packaged CDs into larger format LP-like packaging with some interesting artwork, etc., like the olden days, I would be very happy. I have thought about storing CDs of albums that I burn myself back in the original LP covers in protective sleeves, along with the vinyl. Haven't perfected this approach quite yet though.

Although I do like the sound of good vinyl, it's mostly the fun factor (and readability) of the whole package that appeals to me more so than the inherent sonics of vinyl alone.

Nothing the size of a CD will ever be as much fun as LPs were/are as long as it is packaged into a tiny, mostly unreadable case, as are CDs.

THese days, you get a lot more information about music online than you do anywhere else, so the days of fancy physical packaging of music may be over, I'm afraid.

I agree with the packaging and fun factor of collecting vinyl, I was just in London and picked up this funk compilation album "FUNK DROPS: Breaks, Nuggets and Rarities from the Vaults of Atlantic, Atco, Reprise and Warner Bros 1968-1974" (I wasn't even born yet) and it comes with these liner notes with a brief history of the songs and the musicians...very cool.

I also just got a tube preamp (first one, tube anything) and hooked up my crappy turntable and it sounds awesome... I was just A/B-ing the gear with some friends.. and I'm beginning to see what what people on Audiogon mean about soundstaging, speakers disappearing and "holographic" images.

Very happy with my $40 turntable today.... can't wait to get a proper power amp that is a good impedance match.

Played a 1969 live John Mayall record too.. and it seems fine musicians playing acoustic instruments sound so much better on vinyl.... I don't think it matters as much when I'm playing JT (Justin Timberlake) but I think I saw Sexyback on LP.... (just kidding... sorta)

Some of the new albums come in both digital (CD) and anglog (LP) format.
If you prefer LP in general, have you compared CD and LP for newly released albums?
The only new album I have for both CD and LP is Norah Jones' Come Away with me. On my system, Norah Jones' LP sounds a little bit (very subtle) better with warmth, depth and detail than CD. But my wife does not think so. She just cannot feel any difference. Well, my wife at least recognizes the difference between CD and LP for those early 60/70's LPs and their reissue CDs -- She think LP is much better.

My systme is
Clearaudio bluemotion with Aurum Classic Wood Cartridge, Clearaudio microbasic preamp, Yaqin MC10L tube amplifier (with Siemens EL34 and RCA 6922s replacing Chinse 6N1s), Tyler Taylo 7U speakers, Zu Wax biwire cable, and NAD C541i.

I just wonder whether $30 for Norah's LP was well spent for the the marginal difference.
Anyway, for those of you who have both Norah's LP and CD, do they sound quite close in your systems or quite different?