Walker Valid Points or Mapleshade Footers for preamp?


Hello,
I am looking for place some brass cones under a tube preamp. Is one product better then another for this purposes or does this matter more equipment with more moving parts?
autodexr
Cmk,

1.Audio Federation in CO. is the Distributor. Google HRS M3.
2. Yes. Spacer and Couplers with the M3. Used M3's are $1200.00 on the 'Gon. It must be the right weight allowed for each componant. Once heard you will be addicted to it. Out the door with the WVP & MSF.

FOR SALE MS Heavyfeet v3 and low Heavyfeet.

The M3 goes up for sale and sits on the 'Gon and rots as everyone buys the WVP And MSF. =8^)
Thanks for the link Hotbird. Nice to see you here. ;)

Glory
I would suggest that you try to listen to the MSF and WVP on a solid wood support(they were designed this way) - preferably as heavy as you can find. The effect is very different if you hear it on the Solidtech stuff.

FYI, I had 2 sets of Feet of Silence, but got rid of them after trying the Nordost Ti Pulsar points, and later WVP/MSF. The later are clearly superior to the Solidtech stuff especially if your system has deep bass.
Cmk,

I tossed the FOS also. Trash.

I had the MSF on a MS 4" maple plateform. Sold it all.

JUNK. Toss it. Get rid of it.

Buy a HRS M3.
Over the weekend, a friend also tried out the Mapleshade brass footers under his equipment, and his comment was "Good thing is brass gives dynamism but seems to have no ringing and high frequency issues."

He was using ceramic footers on a composite material which I passed to him. The ceramic/composite mix "seems more [to give] more stark imaging."

He felt both produced life-like sound.

If given such a senario, which would you go for? Better dynamics or imaging?