Tripods as turntable or component base?


Perhaps one of you who is into photography or owns a camera store can try this experiment. Since the tripod is the most stable base (ask any photographer or physicist), has anyone experimented with using them as component bases? All the best turntables and many other components now have 3 legs instead of 4 for that reason. One school of thought says heavy tables for turntables are better (less amplitude of motion for given energy input); others say not (energy storage, pickup of airborne sound energy). The people who used to market Linn specifically recommend flimsy tables (!) but they were fruitcakes. How about taking three tripods, setting up one under each foot? A cheap experiment if you have the tripods... Your colleague in science, hifigeezer
hifigeezer
Hi, Hi,

Seems that some of the posters missed your idea about using a tripod for each of the turntable base feet/points for a total of nine legs. I think it may have merit - "worth a try" - if you could find very solid and stable tripods with easily adjustable height. A surveying tripod with spiked feet might work well. They're used to support equipment that costs thousands of dollars and take very fine measurements. And you could probably find attachment adapters that would screw right into the turntable base. It might look rather goofy but on the other hand it could be an unusual conversation "piece".

Tom
Tripod stability as an urban legend?

I've always wondered whenever I read the suggestion that a three leg support is more stable than four. Do these proponents think it is impossible for a tricycle to tip over? True that a tripod with three legs spreading out from a central point of contact may be more stable than three perpendicular legs under the perimeter of the object they support but that is not the usual audio application. Anyway, I think stability also relates to the mass on top, the height, and how the mass is distributed.

Anyway, I'm glad to see that others have reasons to doubt the absolute superiority of three supports VS four.
Thanks to all for your interest. I have not tried the experiment, I was hoping someone else would. I see lots of posts of people complaining about footsteps bouncing their turntables or feedback from woofers. Perhaps one of those unfortunate souls will invest the time and effort. WalMart lists tripods starting at $15 and I bet some of you could borrow three if needed.

Tketcham gets an "A" on this quiz, both for careful reading and mechanical understanding. I am proposing the use of one tripod per turntable leg, thus three to four tripods total. A tripod can be more stable than a table with four legs. Unless all four legs are EXACTLY the same length, the table can rotate on the two longest legs until the next-longest is grounded. This leaves the shortest leg in the air, so you end up with a tripod but one which is not optimized. As we said in physics class, this assumes all objects are rigid. Each additional leg IN CONTACT with the ground will add stability, but any mismatch of length will cause mismatched load bearing. Yes I am a physicist and yes I should get a life. I agree the WAF for three tripods in the living room could be an issue! The narrow profile of the tripod should in theory make it a poorer antenna for airborne sound waves than a big boxy table. Look at the guy with the microphone on the football sideline; he is using a parabolic reflector to capture the sound.

Considering the megabucks people spend on turntable stands, spikes and cones I am surprised there is not more experimental data on this topic. Try playing loud music from another source or dancing near your turntable and check its output. Let's replace dogma with data!

Why don't magazines test vibration-sensitivity of stands or turntables? Stereo Review did; it should be easier to plot this than loudspeaker or tonearm frequency response. Maybe they like getting ad dollars from the makers of cones and stands. :-)

Regards, hifigeezer
"Since the tripod is the most stable base (ask any photographer or physicist)"

Hmmm...you may be a photographer, but you're definitely not a physicist.

And as for "All the best turntables..........now have 3 legs instead of 4"...., well, that remark shows such a lack of knowledge as to be laughable. And I also note that you've changed your experimental paradigm from "taking three tripods, setting up one under each foot?" to "three to four tripods"-I assume that's because you realized that a 3-point base under a square or rectangular plinth is inherently *unstable*-just press lightly down on any corner that no longer has the benefit of a stable foot

It does make me think, though-imagine you had tripods for footers, and then you put *another* tripod under each leg of those tripods, and then *another* tripod under each leg of those tripods, and then......

Hifigeezer, With all due respect, Stereo Review was a rag. But Mike Fremer did use accelerometer(s) to evaluate the Finite Elemente and the Monaco Grand Prix stands and reported his results in Stereophile. His tests generated quite a furor among devotees of these two very expensive equipment racks.