Tripods as turntable or component base?

Thanks to all for your interest. I have not tried the experiment, I was hoping someone else would. I see lots of posts of people complaining about footsteps bouncing their turntables or feedback from woofers. Perhaps one of those unfortunate souls will invest the time and effort. WalMart lists tripods starting at $15 and I bet some of you could borrow three if needed.

Tketcham gets an "A" on this quiz, both for careful reading and mechanical understanding. I am proposing the use of one tripod per turntable leg, thus three to four tripods total. A tripod can be more stable than a table with four legs. Unless all four legs are EXACTLY the same length, the table can rotate on the two longest legs until the next-longest is grounded. This leaves the shortest leg in the air, so you end up with a tripod but one which is not optimized. As we said in physics class, this assumes all objects are rigid. Each additional leg IN CONTACT with the ground will add stability, but any mismatch of length will cause mismatched load bearing. Yes I am a physicist and yes I should get a life. I agree the WAF for three tripods in the living room could be an issue! The narrow profile of the tripod should in theory make it a poorer antenna for airborne sound waves than a big boxy table. Look at the guy with the microphone on the football sideline; he is using a parabolic reflector to capture the sound.

Considering the megabucks people spend on turntable stands, spikes and cones I am surprised there is not more experimental data on this topic. Try playing loud music from another source or dancing near your turntable and check its output. Let's replace dogma with data!

Why don't magazines test vibration-sensitivity of stands or turntables? Stereo Review did; it should be easier to plot this than loudspeaker or tonearm frequency response. Maybe they like getting ad dollars from the makers of cones and stands. :-)

Regards, hifigeezer

"Since the tripod is the most stable base (ask any photographer or physicist)"

Hmmm...you may be a photographer, but you're definitely not a physicist.

And as for "All the best turntables..........now have 3 legs instead of 4"...., well, that remark shows such a lack of knowledge as to be laughable. And I also note that you've changed your experimental paradigm from "taking three tripods, setting up one under each foot?" to "three to four tripods"-I assume that's because you realized that a 3-point base under a square or rectangular plinth is inherently *unstable*-just press lightly down on any corner that no longer has the benefit of a stable foot

It does make me think, though-imagine you had tripods for footers, and then you put *another* tripod under each leg of those tripods, and then *another* tripod under each leg of those tripods, and then......

Hifigeezer, With all due respect, Stereo Review was a rag. But Mike Fremer did use accelerometer(s) to evaluate the Finite Elemente and the Monaco Grand Prix stands and reported his results in Stereophile. His tests generated quite a furor among devotees of these two very expensive equipment racks.

Lewm:

Thanks for your response and for bringing Fremer's measurements to my attention. It sounds like Mr. Fremer is on the right track.

Whatever its failings, Stereo Review did use a consistent methodology of testing turntables. They had a vibrating table and would test the suspension resonance. Objective, not subjective, for what that's worth.

It seems I was not clear in my writings; I apologize. If your turntable has three feet, put a tripod under each for a total of three tripods. If your turntable has four feet, put a tripod under each for a total of four tripods. I'm too lazy to draw a picture using characters!