Half speed master

I believe that the primary advantage to 1/2 speed mastering is to make it easier to accurately cut HIGH frequency modulations. If the cutter is suppose to be cutting an 18,000 Hz signal, at half speed it is cutting only a 9,000 Hz signal.

It seems if you read this from the link I provided...

MFSL's exclusive "half-speed mastering" also allows us to use only one-fourth the power that real time cutting takes. So we never have to push our cutting head amplifiers to their limits. This gives us much more head room for far superior dynamic range, top-end and overall frequency response, along with better stereo separation. And we don't use transformers or employ limiting in our cutting process."

...that we are both correct.

Thanks for the great explanation.

My understanding is that half-speed mastering was used to cut discrete 4 channel disc in the early 70s. It was developed so they could accurately cut 40kHz+ signals to the vinyl. It was thought that when used on normal stereo recordings that greater fidelity would be achieved, but there is some controversy over that claim. As a process it has stood the test of time, but in and of itself half-speed mastering doesn't guarantee better quality anymore than any other "remastered" claim.

Half-speed mastering is done to move the resonant frequency of the cutterhead up one octave. This makes it a lot easier to deal with. Decca developed this technique in the 1950s; many Londons and Deccas are 1/2 speed mastered.