>>07-26-10: Les_creative_edge
Using good cassette stock especially type II or type IV or even a good type 1 can give me near indistinguishable recordings of vinyl from my LP's themselves.<<

Reviewing your system, especially the turntable, I'm sure that's the case. I own a 1210 logging many hours of experience with it and a half dozen cartridges. The Technics is a decent product, a bargain at its' price point, but no match for my other tables. So it may appear indistinguishable to you now, but if you ever buy a real high end table, the difference will be immediately apparent.

A cassette playback system is no match for a decent analog front end. Apples and oranges.

That is not debatable.
"A cassette playback system is no match for a decent analog front end. That is not debatable."

Aodiofeil has spoken...I guess there's nothing more to say!??
No i don't think so. If just for the fact that in many countries pre recorded caste tapes never sold well. I know here in the Netherland we went from LP to CD. Tapes never sold well.
I agree with Audiofeil. None of my NAK decks stand up to my current vinyl set up. Not that they sound bad, but vinyl is clearly superior. Now my Otari MX-5050 reel is another story using 15ips tapes.
Clio, I concur.

My Sony reel to reel makes scary good copies of vinyl.

Cassettes are cute, handy, and cheap but not serious analog. Then again, in some systems I've seen here, the cassette deck is actually better than the vinyl front end it's compared to. That may account for the cassette cheerleading.

IMO