PsAudio 300?


From everthing that I have read; this sounds like one piece of very exciting equipment. Anybody out there have experience with this baby? The feedback I got from my Ps Audio UO post is not motivating me to go that way, but this, if found used, may do it for me. Show me the light! Please, first hand experience only. Thanks
whirshfield
I'm using a P300 to supply everything in the system except the two amps. There was an immediate and obvious improvement as soon as it was plugged in. It's my belief we suffer from poor quality electricity and I believe the P300 helps there, a lot. I don't have the fan. The unit runs hot to the touch but I'm not pulling anywhere near its capacity. I've experimented with the multiwave feature as well as pushing the voltage up and down. I find neither of these features makes any audible difference at all. Some multiwave settings cause the transformer in the DAC to hum. The only real negative to using it is its own transformer hum. Its not too loud but its a definite minus. I'm experimenting with resonance control now to see if it can be minimized. Last, its great protection for the system. We have frequent brown outs. When the line voltage sags, the P300 cuts out and protects everything. Its worth it for that alone.
After doing a lot of reading about these ( never used one myself ), i'd simply pass on that the general consensus is that 300 watts of rated output is somewhat "liberal". Most folks say that they find these to work best and run a LOT cooler with a max of about 180 - 220 watts of draw on them. Since most SS line level gear pulls next to nothing, that shouldn't create a problem for most basic systems. Running tubes or a very component heavy system might be another story.

You have to remember that this is basically an amplifier circuit and go from there. Running any amp at or very near rated power for extended periods of time is typically not a good thing. Maintaining a reasonable level of headroom not only minimizes strain and heat ( making the fan unnecessary ), it increases linearity and can result in increased lifespan with less hassle along the way.

Simply add up the power draw of each unit that you plan on connecting to the PS and see where the total falls. If you're somewhere around 180 - 220 watts or less, you should be okay. This would put you somewhere between 60% and less than 75% of maximum rated output, allowing appr 25% - 40% of headroom within the circuitry. Hope this helps... Sean
>
I was looking at some power protection/cleaning as well, also thinking PS300 or 600, and read the comments with interest.

What do you guys do for your amps, if they aren't plugged into the PS units? I was kind of wondering whether I'd cross their power limit with a pair of ARC VT100s (bi-amped for main spkrs) and an ARC D240 (surrounds). I'm also curious, for Martin Logan owners (or other ESL owners), whether plugging such speakers into a PS300/600 has helped...
I have been following the progression from Power Plant since in was introduced. I went to my high end dealer and told them about it and was blown off in a way that made me finally realize these people were snobs...4 months later they started carring the product. Anyway, I think PS Audio's design and philosophy in the PP series in rock solid, however the PP does not address line hum caused by the neutral/hot/ground config of our electricity. I have since bought a Cinepro Power Pro 20 and love it. I'm sure the PP will do what it claims to, but again, it doesn't do it all. Read about balanced power before buying.

m-
Power Plants output balanced power,as well as voltage regulation,regeneration,etc.