CD's vs Vinyl - Finally hear the difference


About 2 years ago, I decided to get back into vinyl. I had some old albums I wanted to play, so I blew the dust off my 35 year old TT and fired that mutha up. It took me about 13 months to get my accousic vibration problem licked and to put together some decent analog euipment-some new, some used. Anyway, I started listening to ONLY vinyl. I was surprised how well my albums had been preserved and how well the new ones I purchased sounded. I had read the vinyl purist's comments about how much better records sounded than CD's, but I must admit-I was doubtful. I had put together a fairly good Digital system with a tubed Kora Hermes II DAC. Anyway, I had a friend over the other day and for the first time in almost a year, I put on a CD. I have to say-there is absolutely no comparison how much better vinyl sounds than CD's. CD's sound as though they were recorded in an anechoic chamber. There is no ambience, no warmth, no soul. The music is accurate, but it isn't alive. You simply have to hear it to understand. All the years I wasted listening to CD's! I guess they have their place if you're on the go in cars, boats etc, but if you are wanting to really listen to good quality recorded music, there is only one choice.
handymann
Handyman...it sounds like you need a better CD player. There are levels of perfection in both vinyl and CD.
even though i'm as pro Vinyl as anyone, and know that mid and higher level vinyl playback has significant performance advantages over CD's, i think it's a mistake to say there is something 'wrong' with CD's. i think it's more that CD/Redbook/16/44 just does not have as much right as vinyl does and does not go as far into the musical truth.

the problem is that if a vinyl lover does not continue to give the digital side enough attention then improvements in digital playback can be unknown to them. with my Playback Designs MPS-5, redbook can sound quite analog. my previous experience was that redbook sounded 'digital'.....not anymore.

no; it's does not do the various things as well as good vinyl, but it does them competently.....and you don't feel 'soiled' when listening to redbook. the redbook does not have the same depth, detail and image density of vinyl. it does not quite get the tonality in the bass, it won't tell you as well what kind of skin is on the drum kit. you don't get the same growl in the cello or double bass. but it's not chopped liver, either.
Post removed 
CD's are great- FOR BACKGROUND MUSIC!
For serious listening - Nothing can match vinyl.
I listen to music 8-10 hours a day.
While on my computer it's CD's in the background for 6-8 hours as I don't have to get up every 15 minutes & flip & clean the LP.
Then when I done with my work, the magic begins for 2-3 hours (Vinyl Rules!) until my wife calls me for dinner.
Then back to the man cave for another hour or so to listen to 2 more LP's.
I must admit that I am a tad biased - being a vinyl junkie for close to 50 years (pre CD, pre 8 track, pre cassette & digital tape).
BTW - I am also of the opition that many of my reel to reel tapes sound much better than CD & sometimes even vinyl.
That's my story & I'm sticking to it!