2. analog
  3. 1312079140

CD's vs Vinyl - Finally hear the difference

About 2 years ago, I decided to get back into vinyl. I had some old albums I wanted to play, so I blew the dust off my 35 year old TT and fired that mutha up. It took me about 13 months to get my accousic vibration problem licked and to put together some decent analog euipment-some new, some used. Anyway, I started listening to ONLY vinyl. I was surprised how well my albums had been preserved and how well the new ones I purchased sounded. I had read the vinyl purist's comments about how much better records sounded than CD's, but I must admit-I was doubtful. I had put together a fairly good Digital system with a tubed Kora Hermes II DAC. Anyway, I had a friend over the other day and for the first time in almost a year, I put on a CD. I have to say-there is absolutely no comparison how much better vinyl sounds than CD's. CD's sound as though they were recorded in an anechoic chamber. There is no ambience, no warmth, no soul. The music is accurate, but it isn't alive. You simply have to hear it to understand. All the years I wasted listening to CD's! I guess they have their place if you're on the go in cars, boats etc, but if you are wanting to really listen to good quality recorded music, there is only one choice.
handymann
dgarretson
2,599 posts
 
"(RBCD) does not do the various things as well as good vinyl, but it does them competently.....and you don't feel 'soiled' when listening to redbook"

I've arrived psychologically at a similar place as Mike L. on this point. The things that used to be bothersome about RBCD have been banished, and what's left is a small and forgiveable loss of detail. In addition, at a sufficiently high level of performance the few things that RBCD does better than vinyl-- silent background and channel separation-- stand out and complicate debate on the superiority of the two formats at current SOTA. These days RBCD is definitely better than "background music."
dev's avatar
dev
832 posts
 
As usual another thread geating off topic, all one has to do is read the OP's main thread.

This is not another debate about formats but the OP's take and sharing such with us.

We all have opinions which are okay but some comments made above are just so funny and only demonstate lack of .....
dgarretson
2,599 posts
 
lack of... ? Perhaps an inability to complete one's thought, or an incuriousity about SOTA digital?
dev's avatar
dev
832 posts
 
Dgarretson, you appear to direct your posting towards me so I'll respond.

Lack of ....?

This thread is not a debate about RB vs Vinyl but the OP's take on his own experience, all one has to do is take the time and read.

There have been endless DEBATES on the topic which you can look up.

There are lots of threads in relation to as you call it SOTA digital also but under Digital.

You and a few other posters seem to take issue when a poster suggests Red-Book is background music to them, that's their opinion and you for what ever reason seem to like to dismiss such, yours might differ which is okay but it's your initial responce and how you come across that's in question so what's up with that?

Personally I have had digital all over the place from $2,500.00 to well over $60K in my set-up including the PlayBack, to me up against my vinyl set-up there just no comparison, it's back ground music.

Go to anyones home who has a "top notch" not just "good" vinyl set-up and even if they have Red-Book which they may start off with once you put vinyl on well it's game over and normally you just listen into the late evening.

I took a peak at your set-up, isn't it that way for you also?

Hope you got it this time.

Enjoy!

tzh21y
1,654 posts
 
Nothing can match vinyl, period. Unfortunately, quite a bit of music was never released on vinyl. That is the only reason I have a CD player.
More to discover