2. analog
  3. 1324505028

Do You Love Music or Do You Love Hi-Fi?

I know a lot of hi-fi enthusiasts who seem to have poor taste in music but can talk all day about their audio gear. I got into the high end audio hobby because of my love for music first and foremost, and this has done a pretty good job in guiding my decisions around what equipment to buy. Don't get me wrong, I Jones really hard on gear, but at the end of the day it's not about the gear but how great the music I love sounds on the gear I buy. I study music and learn all I can to discover new music to enjoy, regardless of the genre, but I am certain that I will not be investing in the latest Jennifer Warnes vinyl re-issues. I also wonder why Mo-Fi issued the first three Foreigner albums on vinyl. Are there really that many hard core audiophiles asking for this? There are so many great recordings that are begging for the high end vinyl treatment, it makes me wonder who these people are making decisions about what to release on these labels? I'm sure the entire Don Henley catalog is coming soon from one of these labels.
OK, I'm done ranting, but I really do want to hear what others think about this. Or is it just me? Is it about the gear or is it about the music for you?
128x128snackeyp
syntax's avatar
syntax
2,193 posts
 
Even the biggest audio moron will write he loves music..what do you expect?
I know a lot who have absolutely no idea but they love to spend money on audio gear. That's all. I listened to so many horrible systems, I can't count them anymore. And when I say that to the owner, he hates me for that as long as I live. Love for music? What a joke. Music CAN be pain on certain Systems.
Sometimes it can be a trip into a Performance, but only sometimes..
artemus_5's avatar
artemus_5
1,926 posts
 
Rok2id. Maybe those people who only own 5 albums really treasure the sound of those and want the very best reproduction system to hear them on. Some have deep pockets and can afford the gear. Many deep pockets also spend a lot of time working and traveling and do not have the time to listen to music as maybe you or I do. I have seen many ads for top tier equipment with the reason for selling is a lack of time to listen.

You seem to think their equipment is for show. If it is, why worry about it? If that's what they get off on, so what? But I'm not sure there is much to show in a $100k system today, when most people are thrilled to have an IPod. I think $100k would buy something more cool or hip than a stereo system.

A Corvette ZR1 would probably get much more attention without all the questions that a $100k stereo would get. Most people would think it utterly silly to spend that much money on a music system when there are IPods for much less. But everyone understands the ZR 1 and won't question the sanity of someone who spends the $$$ on it
Just a thought
rok2id's avatar
rok2id
7,859 posts
 
Artemus_5:

I agree with all your points. I don't think the vast majority of people buy high-end for show. I appreciate well made beautiful things also. If money was no object would I have the system I have now? NO WAY! My point of contention with high-end audiophiles, is that they seem to think that ANYTHING that can be identified, can be HEARD by humans. Also that high-grade components will always be HEARD. I just beg to disagree.
I realize they also say measuements have nothing to do with how a piece sounds.
peterayer
1,382 posts
 
I like both, and for me the hobby is about both. One could ask "On which do you spend more money?" My guess is that most of us spend more on one than on the other. And only a few of us spend about the same on each.

I find it interesting that most contributers to this thread don't have "system" links. Nor do they describe their music preferences.
kevvwill
70 posts
 
Peterayer makes a fun point: "I find it interesting that most contributers to this thread don't have "system" links. Nor do they describe their music preferences."

I had the same system for 20+ years, and only changed it just now in the name of visual appeal. Should probably update that. As far as music preferences, I'm a true omnivore (audiovore?), so I'm not really categorizable that way, either. Everything is too simplistic, right?

I once did a "random" play on my portable, and listed the first 30 songs that came up. People thought I was kidding! It was everything from Haydn's "Nelson" mass to Faiz Ali Faiz (amazing qawwal, next Nusrat Ali Khan), the Minutemen, Olivia Newton-John, Melt-Banana, Sinatra, Wu-Tang, Peter Brotzmann etc, etc.

Great music is great music, and I try not to limit myself, like lots of folks, I imagine.
More to discover