Who listens only to vinyl?



WHY, and what turntable set-up are you choosing to live with?
(This is NOT a vinyl versus digital thread, it's a lifestyle thread!)

Recently, I'm heading in this direction, mostly I think because I have never invested enough attention and money to bring up digital listening into the pleasure zone. I also like messing around with record cleaning and arms and cartridges, and worrying whether my TT belt needs replacing. And the sound of course!

If you are one of these vinyl-only people, how did you get there, and how do you feel about living with restricted access to a lot of newer recordings, both classical and other genres? Is it an issue for you?

[Pro-ject 2 Xperience with Shure v15 type IV-JICO SAS stylus]
sumaato
I have not posted for many years but your post has prompted a reply. I have a custom CDL plinth with Lenco particulars, an Alphason HR-100S tonearm, and a Monster Cable Sigma 2000 MK2. cartridge. My Pre is a Rogue Magmum 99 with NOS tubes of my preference - amp is a McCormack Deluxe with Mods.

I never play cds even though I have a Jitter sink made by a well established designer.

Vinyl is the path for those seeking a higher plane. If you are not into vinyl you will never understand. It is the Alpha and the Omega of life.

The Bordeaux continues to call and I must obey. End of transmission.
I listen to only vinyl. In the past I would warm up my system with my CDP, dont even use it for that anymore.
Just a personal point. I recently upgraded my CDP to the ARC Ref CD-8, which is very very good. I think my vinyl set up is pretty decent too: VPI classic, ARC PH-7 phono pre and Sound Smith VPI Zephyr carty.

Here are the challenges I face. First, source material, be it CD or vinyl, can be a a challenge unto itself. Some of my CDs really shine on my rig, but many simply do not. I attribute this more to the CD than my system. The same is also true for my LPs, although by and large, my old collection from the 70s and 80s are a pleasure. So I bounce back and forth.

The second point is practical. I rediscovered vinyl about a year and a half ago. I liked it a lot and played it a lot. Just recently, as a couple of my threads will explain, I sent my Zephyr back to Sound Smith for a check and a retip. The cost wasn't too bad - about $250. But removing and resetting my cartrige was inconvenient. Also, Peter Ledermann of Sound Smith said that I will probably need to retip every 1000 hours, which is easy to rack up over a year or so.

So the bottom line is that I really enjoy both source inputs, subject to the quality of the CD and vinyl. But in light of the somewhat limited "shelf life" of my carty's stylus and the simple convenience of sitting down and listening to about an hour of music on CD versus 15-20 mins for each side of an LP, I'm kinda biased in favor of my CDP for now. Who knows -- if I pick up a stack of new LPs from my local vintage record store, I may shift back.
Like Tom_Hankins,I would warm up my system on a CDP while having my turntable spinning.
These old ears always preferred analog so I never really invested in digital gear.
I was looked at as a throw back to my kids and their friends.
Today,they want to borrow my cherished LP's to play on their analog gear.
What a difference a day makes !!!
I never changed from vinyl- i started in the mid-60's with a ratty all in one
stereo as a kid, when vinyl was the only viable mainstream format for
prerecorded music, and as time passed, and my hi-fi taste and budget
improved, i simply continued on the same path. CD was pretty horrible in
1984, and held no interest for me. Of course i have over the years acquired
a variety of CD and DVD players, but those were always for use on smaller
systems elsewhere in the house, or for the home theatre system.
I still have most of the records I bought as a kid, and the pile is now about
10,000 records. I don't feel limited by the format in terms of availability of
material, although the hunt for a particular recording can sometimes be
challenging. Many new pop records are being released on vinyl as well, so
if I want to get something 'new' that's less of a problem than ever. And, of
course, there are many wonderful reissues, often of old recordings made
without multi-tracking, that benefit from the low surface noise of a fresh,
high quality pressing. Of course, the real pain in the ass is the warm-up
time, cuing a record is never really an issue, since even if i am doing
something else, like reading, I am not bothered by the prospect of having to
get out of my chair and find another selection. (In fact, on a background
system elsewhere in the house, i rarely like the sequence of any playlist
assembled before hand, i am much more a creature of mood at the time i
am actually listening). Living with vinyl is a bit more of a pain, but worth it to
me. The sonics for critical listening are worth the effort.
In terms of equipment, for very long time, I used a Well-Tempered TT, it
was pretty trouble-free once set up properly, and sounded great. As the
system gradually improved, so did the turntable. At this point, I am using a
huge Kuzma, with the Airline arm- and my only real complaint is the air
pump for the arm, which is noisy, spits oil and is fidgety. Otherwise, even
this massive turntable with esoteric arm is pretty trouble free once it is set
up. (The smaller "Reference" by Kuzma may be the better table for most
purposes, given its built-in isolation, smaller footprint and lower price). I'm
sure there are plenty of good decks that offer close to the pinnacle these
days without getting too carried away. And note the number of people that
are using really 'period' turntables brought back to life -Garrard 301, Panny
SP-10 (still have mine from the early 70's and it still works, though it is not
set up right now).