Adjusting counterweight on Loricraft RCM

In addition to the many useful suggestions above do check Yip Mint's site as he has some interesting ideas eg putting a bit of vaseline on the jar collar where the lid comes in contact is a huge plus otherwise it can be difficult to prise open the jar.
Like Peter I also use the brass arm of my PRC 4 from lp edge to label then crossing the spindle/record clamp(I have an old Michel Gyro clamp)from the label to outer edge. Unlike Peter I use this routine with the enzyme cleaner as also for the distilled water rinse.
IME the thread curling occurs because the white nozzle gets wet creating extra friction for the thread. As Doug says one way of avoiding this is to keep the vacuum pump on with the nozzle in its resting place(the PRC 4 has a brass receptacle) otherwise let the arm dangle on the side.
Congratulations on the Loricraft. Its a great RCM.
Pradeep

Thanks for the additonal info and congrats Pradeep.

I lowered the counterweight and it seems the issue with the curling of thread under the nozzle is almost gone. It happened once during cleaning of appr 15 records.

Maybe another cause that contributed to my problem was that the thread became too wet because I was using too much fluid (I literally flooded the record) and/or I did not wait long enough to have a part of the fluid evaporated. I am now using less liquid, but make sure that it is still wet all over, then wait about 1 minute and dry the record from the label outwards. ANd leave the pump on between the cleaning steps.

I did some test recordings before and after the cleaning and the result is really amazing. Less pops and crackle and much more detail (dynamics) in the music. What a great machine!

The brush is dry when you start to clean your first record, here you need the
most fluid, with the next record and the following ones you need less fluid for
the cleaning. After a few records you will get the right experience for it.

Point nozzle design and its result is simple school knowledge (Physics -->
ouch) transferred to High End :-) I know, this is not fair but ...

Using too much fluid doesn't necessarily clean better. If the fluid isn't down inside the grooves in contact with contaminants it isn't really doing anything but making a mess. :-)

Agree with Peter and Pradeep regarding a double vacuum sweep, especially for the final rinse. I do it just as Peter described.

Agree with Syntax regarding fluid usage on the first side being greater than on subsequent sides, as some base amount of each fluid is needed to wet whatever brush you're using. One advantage of the brushes sold by AIVS is that they don't hold much fluid... less cross-contamination and less fluid waste. It's useless for scrubbing but it's debatable how much use scrubbing is anyway.

Glad your're enjoying! IME, clicks and pops are best eliminated by use of an enzyme-based solution as the first step. Greater detail and micro-dynamics are a result of really thorough cleaning and rinsing. Two rinses with *very* pure water will bare the tiniest modulations and let you hear deeper into a recording than you ever thought possible. That's the true test of a clean groove, not how quiet it is. In fact, a truly clean groove is often slightly noisier than an almost clean one... but the additional musical information is more than worth it. When I clean and replay a visitor's record he's blown away by music he never heard before, not by how quiet it is between the notes. :-)