Oracle Delphi Mk V suspension height

Oldears, when you get this sorted out, can you tell us how the Oracle V compares to the Oracle 2? I'm less interested in the sound(other than in the bass), and more interested in the effect it has on listening enjoyment-not so much in discovering new information from well-known lps.

Wrote Oracle Tues & Wed, no response yet. Went to Lowes & got a faucet handle removal tool. Raised the pulley by 2 mm to a height of 72 mm above plinth (spec 71). Raised the skirt height to 19mm (spec 20). Good enough for me. But the Oracle specs will not allow the belt to stay on for this model.
Note I have owned & maintained an Oracle for 33 years.

For the sound question: The old Oracle is a Mk I with the Pabst Hall effect DC motor, the Mk II suspension, a Perfectionist Engineering polymer bearing, a separate linear 27 V DC power supply, an acrylic platter mat from Holland, and is in good working order. The replacement is a Mk V SE (with granite base and Turbo PS). I took the tonearm & disc from the old table to the new, & made minor adjustments in VTA and azimuth.
The individual sound differences are not as large as you might think, but they do add up. The biggest difference is in "jump" (macro-dynamics?). The bass goes only a little lower, but is cleaner. The imaging width & depth is a little better, the noise level a little better (micro-dynamics?). The sound is a little more precise throughout. The sense of realism is much improved. I couldn't go back.

Thanks. I'm pretty sure I never even came close to setting up my Oracle Mk 2 correctly.

Rec'd a response yesterday from Oracle. My setup is OK. The 1mm free play of the motor shaft is normal. The Torlan thrust plate for MK VI can be used in the Mk V bearing.