Anybody tried 20th Anniversary Purist cables?

louis1, I am thinking about the Aqueous or Venustas as well. If you dont mind I would be greatly interested to hear what Purist says about these two cables.

Tboooe,
I plan on calling Purist next week. When I do, I'll keep you posted. From reading the posts above, it sounds like most find the Venustas to be the fuller sounding and the Aqueous perhaps a little more on the neutral side.
My experiences with the Aqueous have been nothing but favorable in my system. The Aqueous have nice body, color and texture with good detail. I think I'm really limited in hearing all that the Aqueous can give me, due to the fact that I'm listening to my speakers (VSA VR4 Gen III SE's) with Purist's lower line 'Museaus' Speaker cables. But, the Museaus is absolutely the BEST BUY in audio speaker cables ever! So much performance for such a reasonable price - put simply, very musical. This is how I got started with Purist.
Again, I'll keep you posted as to what Purist has to say.

hi have Aqueous anv cable 21 ft balanced have 37 hrs with a pre burn in of 75 hrs at purist. Cables sounds hooded and closed dowm when will they open up right now my synergistic sounds better. Thanks!!

"Cables sounds hooded and closed "

EBM, that is exactly what I heard from the Aqueous as well. The sample I listen to was also a balanced set, though it was only 3 ft long. Could the positive reports mostly be for RCA versions? Or is it a mass case of H.C. Andersen's Chorea?

What does "hooded" mean? And closed in? Now we have the extremes ... "closed" and overly forward to the point of major fatigue. Don't think I ever read about cables that give everyone here such a different result.