Scar972
I don't know what that means, "an audiophile talking about audiophile cable."
You have made a number of objective claims of fact, none of which have been substantiated with any sort of objective evidence or proof.
Well, when one makes objective claims of fact, the substantiation of those claims must also be objective. If you have no objective substantiation for your objective claims, then you're doing little more than trying to pass off opinion as fact.
Is that what it means to be an "audiophile talking about audiophile cable"? To pass opinion off as fact?
It has nothing to do with whether it can be measured. It has to do with first establishing that there is in fact an actual audible difference between them.
And here is yet another objective claim of fact. When exactly was this established as fact?
How do you know this is necessarily the case? How do you know they don't do it simply because many people have been prejudiced against it by people trying to pass off opinion as fact?
Now here you are spouting off while demonstrating you don't even know what you're talking about.
First, oxidation and corrosion are not one and the same. Corrosion is a two part process that requires both oxidation and reduction, where material is actually lost.
Copper actually RESISTS corrosion. This is what gives it such high value in applications such as roofing material and water pipes.
As I said in a previous post, the microscopically thin film of oxidation that quickly forms on the surface when it's exposed to air actually acts as a protective barrier against both further oxidation and corrosion.
So please, before you go trying to scare people about "corroded cable," get your facts straight.
se
It seems our point of view is different, you're looking at it from the technical side, mine is from an audiophile talking about audiophile cable.
I don't know what that means, "an audiophile talking about audiophile cable."
You have made a number of objective claims of fact, none of which have been substantiated with any sort of objective evidence or proof.
Some of you sound like many of the electrical types I've talked to where everything has to be proven with numbers and measurements.
Well, when one makes objective claims of fact, the substantiation of those claims must also be objective. If you have no objective substantiation for your objective claims, then you're doing little more than trying to pass off opinion as fact.
Is that what it means to be an "audiophile talking about audiophile cable"? To pass opinion off as fact?
These people will never believe two audio cable can sound different because it can't be measured.
It has nothing to do with whether it can be measured. It has to do with first establishing that there is in fact an actual audible difference between them.
Audio cable is NOT and never an exact science, I repeat NOT. While skin affect does occur at frequencies above 20khz, differences can still be heard.
And here is yet another objective claim of fact. When exactly was this established as fact?
High End cable designers don't come up with a design so that their cable will only sound as they intend after oxidation has occured, they do their best to limit oxidation with the use of Teflon & PE, this is why we don't see many exposed copper in high end cable design.
How do you know this is necessarily the case? How do you know they don't do it simply because many people have been prejudiced against it by people trying to pass off opinion as fact?
My point of all this rambling is, oxidation has to be taken seriously in a high end cable because the signature sound that the designer intended will be no longer be after corrosion occurs. I don't think audiophiles want to spend hundreds to thousands of dollars on a corroded cable anyway.
Now here you are spouting off while demonstrating you don't even know what you're talking about.
First, oxidation and corrosion are not one and the same. Corrosion is a two part process that requires both oxidation and reduction, where material is actually lost.
Copper actually RESISTS corrosion. This is what gives it such high value in applications such as roofing material and water pipes.
As I said in a previous post, the microscopically thin film of oxidation that quickly forms on the surface when it's exposed to air actually acts as a protective barrier against both further oxidation and corrosion.
So please, before you go trying to scare people about "corroded cable," get your facts straight.
se