Albums you use to test your gears?


Which CDs/LPs would you use to test/compare your system components?
I am going to compare the following components.
preamp: Clearaudio Microbasic vs Yaqin MS-12B tube preamp
- Amp: Linn AV5105 power amp with Yaqin MS-12B vs Yaqin MC-10L integrated amp
- Cable: Zu Wax biwire vs Linn K400 biwire vs Canare 4S11 quad vs single wire (old and cheap) stranded XLO cable
- Turntable: Thorens TD145MKii/Grado gold vs Clearaudio Emotion/aurum classics

My other components are Tyler Taylo 7U speakers and NAD C541i CDP.

My experience so far is that Linn AV5105 (even with the cheapest XLO cable) is a clear winner over Yaqin MC-10L (even with upgrade tubes and the most expensive Zu cable). The difference is readily noticeable with whatever kinds of CD/LP I listen to.
Emotion is marginally better than TD145MKii, but not as much as with amps.

However, it is rather subtle to discern the difference for phono preamps and speaker cables.
Maybe the preamps are very similar and my systems overall are not refined enough to show differences.

I wonder it would help further discern the differences if a particular kinds of music (either on CD or LP) are used for comparison testing.

Any input would be appreciated.
128x128ihcho
I always thought that ecm lable jazz recordings,peter erskines as it is,bo bo stensons war orphans.My point is if the piano sounds like it should your on to something.i think that the better the recording the less false info youll hear.Thats if you are a fan of trio jazz i guess.Its just easy to dercern whats hyped and what sounds natural,imho.
I usually bring the best recorded music that I enjoy listening to. I see no point in bringing audiophile selections that don't engage me in the music simply because they are good recordings. As Mapman points out, bring a wide variety of material that is representative of the range of music you listen to. I'd disagree that any system should sound good regardless of source material. If your source material is poorly engineered/mixed/recorded there is very little a good system can do to correct any of that. Garbage in = Garbage out. I see no point in bringing poorly recorded music to test, unless it is something you listen to often... I suppose it will tell you what to expect from the system in that specific regard.

I don't know that the best recorded material that I enjoy is necessarily material that you'd enjoy, but here's a few picks.

For hall ambiance and vocal dynamics I like, El Cant de la Sibil La.

For bass, percussion and soundstaging, Qalam Kar, by Trio Chemirani

For leanings towards jazz, bass, piano Achirana

For female vocals, soundstage Holly Cole's tribute to Tom Wates, Temptation

For male vocals selections from either Johnny Cash or Greg Brown.

For stark, solo violin Bach Works for Violin Solo, by Lara St. John

I don't listen to much densely textured dynamic music such as Rock or Orchestral so I tend not to bring anything in that realm. If I did I'd probably choose something from Beck or Radiohead.
This CD will satisfy all your test needs.
Magnificent Recording Quality, World Class Musicianship, Gorgeous Music.

Rosa Passos and Ron Carter
"Entre Amigos" / "Among Friends"
Producers David Chesky and Cliff Korman
Engineer Barry Wilifson
I use the first cut of side two, In Your Eyes, from Peter Gabriel's "So" album to test tonearm/cartridge alignment.

The words "instincts" and "churches" are repeated a number of times. They will mistrack i.e. excessive sibilance if your alignment is off.

Listen for clarity and neatness of the letter "S" in both words.

This of course does not guarantee ideal alignment but, among others, it's one of the passages I use when setting up a tonearm and/or cartridge.